Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Characterization of bone cements.

J R de Wijn, T J Slooff, F C Driessens

    Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
    |April 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Acrylic bone cements show significant differences in handling properties but similar material performance. Additives and porosity negatively impact bone cement strength, affecting clinical outcomes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The effect of scaffold-cell entrapment capacity and physico-chemical properties on cartilage regeneration.

    Biomaterials·2013
    Same author

    Bulk properties and bioactivity assessment of porous polymethylmethacrylate cement loaded with calcium phosphates under simulated physiological conditions.

    Acta biomaterialia·2012
    Same author

    Finite Element Analysis of Meniscal Anatomical 3D Scaffolds: Implications for Tissue Engineering.

    The open biomedical engineering journal·2009
    Same author

    The effect of scaffold architecture on properties of direct 3D fiber deposition of porous Ti6Al4V for orthopedic implants.

    Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2009
    Same author

    Integrating novel technologies to fabricate smart scaffolds.

    Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition·2008
    Same author

    Bone graft incorporation after reconstruction of bony defects with impacted morselized bone graft. Histology of animals and patients.

    Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja·2007
    Same journal

    The treatment of bowleg in rickets.

    Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica·2010
    Same journal

    Tuberculosis of the bones and joints of the foot, including an analysis of the material of the Danish Disablement Pension Board of the years 1921-1940.

    Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica·2010
    Same journal

    Herniated nucleus pulposus in a child of twelve years.

    Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica·2010
    Same journal

    On fracture of the carpal scaphoid; a method for operative treatment of inveterate fractures.

    Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica·2010
    Same journal

    Arthrodesis in the treatment of tuberculous coxitis sequelae.

    Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica·2010
    Same journal

    Fibular autograft and silicone implant arthroplasty after resection of giant cell tumor of the metacarpal--a case report with 9-year follow-up.

    Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica·2005
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Biomaterials Science
    • Orthopedic Surgery

    Background:

    • Acrylic bone cements are widely used in orthopedic surgery for fixation.
    • Understanding their properties is crucial for optimal clinical performance and patient safety.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To characterize the handling and material properties of three acrylic bone cement brands.
    • To evaluate the influence of additives and porosity on these properties.

    Main Methods:

    • Determined curing time and consistency for handling characteristics.
    • Assessed post-curing properties: water resorption, solubility, flexural modulus, yield stress, proportional limit, flexural strength, and impact strength.
    • Investigated the effects of radiopacifying/antibiotic additives and porosity.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Significant variations observed in the handling properties of the tested bone cements.
    • Minimal differences noted in the fundamental material properties across the three brands.
    • Radiopacifying and antibiotic additives demonstrated a detrimental effect on material properties.
    • Porosity developed during simulated clinical curing conditions had a pronounced negative impact on strength.

    Conclusions:

    • Handling characteristics of acrylic bone cements vary considerably between brands.
    • Additives and porosity significantly compromise the mechanical integrity of bone cements.
    • Careful consideration of cement composition and handling is necessary to optimize performance and minimize risks in orthopedic procedures.