Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Modeling games from the 20th century.

¹Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, 85287-1104, Tempe, AZ, USA

Behavioural Processes

|May 23, 2001

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same journal

REM sleep deprivation during mid-pregnancy alters exploratory behaviors in dams and induces locomotor hyperactivity in mouse offspring.

Behavioural processes·2026

Same journal

Sex and brain maturation underlie the attribution of incentive salience to conditioned stimuli in Wistar rats.

Behavioural processes·2026

Same journal

Shining a light on jellyfish behaviour: Enhanced motor activity and positive phototaxis in Aurelia coerulea.

Behavioural processes·2026

Same journal

Detour-task performance in color polymorphic male mosquitofish.

Behavioural processes·2026

Same journal

Behavioral and physiological changes during the estrous cycle of socially housed female guinea pigs.

Behavioural processes·2026

Same journal

Flexible time-series analysis: A dynamically aware method for inferring directed dependencies in behavioral data.

Behavioural processes·2026

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Scientists solve problems by mapping data to models, but limited attention affects understanding. Comprehension requires Aristotle

Area of Science:

Integrates philosophy of science with scientific practice.
Focuses on cognitive and epistemological aspects of scientific inquiry.

Background:

Traditional scientific frameworks often overlook cognitive limitations.
Understanding scientific explanation requires a multidimensional approach.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a novel scientific framework viewing scientists as problem-solvers.
To explore the interplay between attentional capacity, understanding, and scientific modeling.
To integrate Aristotelian concepts of explanation into scientific comprehension.

Main Methods:

Conceptual framework development.
Analysis of cognitive limitations in scientific endeavors.
Review and application of diverse modeling languages (e.g., set theory, calculus of variations).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Proposes a problem-solving model for scientific activity.
Highlights the trade-off between depth of understanding and breadth of vision due to attentional limits.
Demonstrates the necessity of Aristotle's four causes (trigger, function, substrate, model) for complete scientific explanation.

Conclusions:

Scientific comprehension is enhanced by a framework integrating problem-solving, cognitive constraints, and Aristotelian explanation.
Effective modeling across various languages is crucial for mapping data to solutions.
Distinguishes the dynamic process of science from its static products.