Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

2-D motion estimation using two parallel receive beams.

L N Bohs1, S C Gebhart, M E Anderson

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0281, USA. larry.bohs@duke.edu

IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
|May 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interaction of Concentration and Temperature of Acetic Acid Solution on Reduction of Various Species of Microorganisms on Beef Surfaces.

Journal of food protection·2019
Same author

Counts of Six Types of Bacteria on Lamb Carcasses Dipped or Sprayed with Acetic Acid at 25° or 55°C and Stored Vacuum Packaged at 0°C.

Journal of food protection·2019
Same author

Evaluation of Swab and Tissue Excision Methods for Recovering Microorganisms from Washed and Sanitized Beef Carcasses <sup>1,</sup> <sup>2</sup>.

Journal of food protection·2019
Same author

Microbial Decontamination and Weight of Carcass Beef as Affected by Automated Washing Pressure and Length of Time of Spray <sup>1</sup>.

Journal of food protection·2019
Same author

A Simple Qualitative Method for Detecting Cleanliness of Food Contact Surfaces.

Journal of food protection·2019
Same author

Microbiological and Sensory Tests of Beef Treated with Acetic and Formic Acids <sup>1,</sup> <sup>2</sup>.

Journal of food protection·2019
Same journal

Theoretical Foundations of the Echo Envelope Statistical Modeling: A Tutorial.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Practical Demonstrations of FR3-Band Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Acoustic Filter Design.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Real-Time Heterogeneous Helical Wave Spectrum Method for Transabdominal Passive Acoustic Mapping.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Cascaded Plane Wave Ultrasound Velocity Vector Imaging: In Vivo Feasibility in Carotid Arteries.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Quantitative Acoustic Attenuation Scanning Using a Phase-Insensitive Ultrasound Computed Tomography System.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

FPGA-Accelerated CNN Reconstruction for Low-Power Sparse-Array Ultrasound Imaging.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
See all related articles

A new two-beam ultrasound method accurately estimates 2-D target motion, outperforming the four-beam technique. This simplified approach reduces directional errors and improves precision for enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Ultrasound Technology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Traditional ultrasound ensemble tracking methods for 2-D motion estimation require multiple parallel receive beams (≥4) and complex 2-D pattern matching.
  • These methods can be prone to directional errors and may require amplitude normalization, limiting their practical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a simplified ultrasound method for estimating two-dimensional (2-D) target motion.
  • To compare the performance of the new two-beam method against the established four-beam technique in terms of accuracy, precision, and directional error.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed method utilizes only two parallel receive beams and performs one-dimensional (1-D) pattern matching in lateral directions.
  • Sub-pixel resolution is achieved through interpolation, and the lateral motion direction is determined by the best match between the two beams.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance was evaluated using a translating speckle target and a laminar flow phantom at various angles, alongside computer simulations.

    • Main Results:

    • The two-beam method demonstrated higher accuracy and precision compared to the four-beam method, particularly at a 90-degree transducer angle.
    • The two-beam approach exhibited fewer directional errors, especially for small translations, and was more accurate in measuring flow angle at low velocities.
    • The four-beam method's poorer performance was attributed to inter-beam correlation differences, leading to increased directional errors.

    Conclusions:

    • Two-beam ensemble tracking offers an accurate and simplified approach for 2-D motion estimation in ultrasound imaging.
    • This method overcomes limitations of previous techniques, offering improved accuracy, precision, and reduced directional errors.
    • The two-beam method provides a robust alternative for various ultrasound applications, including flow measurement.