Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Screening: ethical principles].

P Haehnel1

  • 1Conseil national de l'Ordre des médecins, 60, bd de Latour-Maubourg, 75007 Paris.

Bulletin Du Cancer
|May 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

France

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Breast density: a major parameter to follow during hormone replacement therapy].

Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilite·2009
Same author

[Breast cancer screening].

Journal de radiologie·2002
Same author

[A decentralized breast cancer screening program in the French department of Bas-Rhin].

Journal de radiologie·2000
Same author

[Breast cancer screening: ethical problems. The Strasbourg experiment. Deontological issues raised by breast cancer screening: quality assurance and accreditation of structures].

Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine·1999
Same author

Quality control in mammography: an initiative in France.

The British journal of radiology·1994
Same author

Europe against Cancer breast cancer screening programme in France: the ADEMAS programme in Bas-Rhin.

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)·1994
Same journal

[Off-label use of venetoclax in myeloma].

Bulletin du cancer·2026
Same journal

[Cemiplimab - Adjuvant treatment for the cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas with high risk of relapse, operated and treated by radiotherapy].

Bulletin du cancer·2026
Same journal

Real-world outcomes and management of endometrial cancer in France from 2016 to 2021 (MOONBEAM study).

Bulletin du cancer·2026
Same journal

[Cardiotoxicity in children and adolescents with acute leukemia: Recommendations from the Leukemia Committee of the French Society of Childhood Cancer (SFCE)].

Bulletin du cancer·2026
Same journal

[Reirradiation: A new therapeutic paradigm in oncology].

Bulletin du cancer·2026
Same journal

[Robotics in oncological surgery].

Bulletin du cancer·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Healthcare Policy
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • France is implementing its first large-scale mass cancer screening program.
  • This initiative raises fundamental questions about the balance between community health and individual autonomy.
  • The organization of mass screenings necessitates careful consideration of ethical, social, and practical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the ethical and organizational challenges of mass cancer screening in France.
  • To emphasize the importance of individual liberty and voluntary participation in public health initiatives.
  • To highlight the critical need for proper training and neutral assessment of healthcare professionals involved in screening.

Main Methods:

  • The study discusses the organizational aspects and ethical considerations of mass cancer screening.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It emphasizes principles of social justice, individual liberty, and data privacy.
  • It stresses the necessity of specialized training and competency assessment for medical practitioners.

    • Main Results:

    • Mass cancer screening in France presents novel organizational and ethical dilemmas.
    • Voluntary participation, data secrecy, and informed consent are paramount.
    • Adequate training and neutral evaluation of healthcare providers are crucial for program success.

    Conclusions:

    • Successful mass cancer screening requires balancing community benefit with individual rights.
    • Ensuring voluntary participation and maintaining data confidentiality are essential.
    • Continuous training and objective assessment of medical personnel are vital for effective and ethical screening programs.