Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Behavioral sampling techniques for feedlot cattle.

F M Mitlöhner1, J L Morrow-Tesch, S C Wilson

  • 1Department of Animal Science & Food Technology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409-2141, USA.

Journal of Animal Science
|May 26, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of oral meloxicam on physiological and behavioral outcomes of weaned calves following band castration.

Translational animal science·2025
Same author

Antimony release and volatilization from organic-rich and iron-rich submerged soils.

Journal of hazardous materials·2024
Same author

A glucocorticoid receptor agonist improves post-weaning growth performance in segregated early-weaned pigs.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2019
Same author

Locating fish bomb blasts in real-time using a networked acoustic system.

Marine pollution bulletin·2018
Same author

The potential for portable X-ray fluorescence determination of soil copper at ancient metallurgy sites, and considerations beyond measurements of total concentrations.

Journal of environmental management·2017
Same author

A natural interomone 2-methyl-2-butenal stimulates feed intake and weight gain in weaned pigs.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2016
Same journal

In vivo methane abatement by pyromellitic diimide in sheep and redirection of rumen hydrogen by co-administered feed additives.

Journal of animal science·2026
Same journal

Ruminal 5-hydroxytryptophan increases serum serotonin and peripheral vasodilation in growing beef cattle.

Journal of animal science·2026
Same journal

Water intake and consumption behaviour of colony and privately-owned healthy domestic cats fed 100% dry, 50% dry and 50% wet, and 100% wet diets: A comparison of research and home environments.

Journal of animal science·2026
Same journal

Gestational Vitamin and Mineral Supplementation in F0 Beef Heifers: Impacts on F1 Heifer Nutrient Digestibility, Metabolic Balance, and F1 Dam and F2 Fetus Development.

Journal of animal science·2026
Same journal

A self-reinforcing transcriptional loop: ELF5 directly activates the STAT5B promoter to orchestrate milk protein synthesis in water buffalo.

Journal of animal science·2026
Same journal

Provision of porcine milk oligosaccharides to support the weaning transition in nursery pigs fed diets including bovine milk co-products.

Journal of animal science·2026
See all related articles

Scan sampling with 1- to 15-minute intervals accurately measures feedlot cattle behavior. Shorter intervals provide more precise results for behaviors like feeding and walking, improving data collection efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Animal Behavior
  • Agricultural Science
  • Animal Husbandry

Background:

  • Continuous behavioral observation is accurate but labor-intensive for large animal groups.
  • Efficient and accurate methods are needed for behavioral data collection in feedlot cattle production systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate efficient behavioral data collection methods for feedlot cattle.
  • To compare the accuracy and precision of scan sampling and time sampling against continuous observation.

Main Methods:

  • Compared continuous behavioral sampling with scan sampling (1-60 min intervals) and time sampling using video recordings of 64 heifers.
  • Experiment 1 (n=24) assessed sampling method accuracy. Experiment 2 (n=40) determined the number of focal animals needed for representative sampling.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Scan sampling with 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-minute intervals accurately estimated behavior duration compared to continuous sampling.
  • Longer scan intervals (30-60 min) and time sampling were less accurate, particularly for short-duration behaviors.
  • Focal animal sampling with one animal was representative for most behaviors, except drinking, which required observing 40% of the pen.

Conclusions:

  • Scan sampling with short intervals (1-15 min) provides accurate and efficient behavioral data for feedlot cattle.
  • Focal animal sampling can be effective, but sample size needs adjustment for specific behaviors like drinking.
  • Validated methods enable precise and efficient quantification of feedlot cattle behavior, aiding production system management.