Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Beyond HERS: some (not so) random thoughts on randomized clinical trials.

T Bush1

  • 1University of Maryland College Park, USA.

International Journal of Fertility and Women'S Medicine
|May 26, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lower serum adiponectin level is associated with lipodystrophy among HIV-infected men in the Study to Understand the Natural History of HIV/AIDS in the Era of Effective Therapy (SUN) study.

HIV medicine·2019
Same author

Frailty and Pre-Frailty in a Contemporary Cohort of HIV-Infected Adults.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2016
Same author

Habitability: A Review.

Astrobiology·2016
Same author

Factors associated with prevalent abnormal anal cytology in a large cohort of HIV-infected adults in the United States.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2010
Same author

Chronic exposure to outdoor air pollution and lung function in adults.

Thorax·2009
Same author

Overview and implementation of an intervention to prevent adherence failure among HIV-infected adults initiating antiretroviral therapy: lessons learned from Project HEART.

AIDS care·2006

Different study designs yield varied data quality. While randomized clinical trials are often preferred, prospective cohort studies offer advantages in certain research areas, like evaluating menopausal estrogen therapy and tamoxifen efficacy.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology and Clinical Research Methodology
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Biostatistics and Study Design Evaluation

Background:

  • Science relies on accumulating evidence from diverse study designs, each offering unique data qualities and potential biases.
  • Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), particularly double-blind, placebo-controlled, intention-to-treat studies, are considered gold standards but possess inherent limitations.
  • Prospective cohort studies, an observational approach, share similarities with RCTs in following participants over time but avoid certain biases and limitations.

Discussion:

  • RCT limitations include high costs, generalizability issues, placebo effects, and problematic intention-to-treat analyses.
  • Prospective cohort studies circumvent placebo effects and are less prone to abrupt study truncation due to external monitoring.
  • Conflicting results between observational and RCT data, as seen in menopausal estrogen therapy trials (e.g., HERS), highlight design-specific challenges.

Related Experiment Videos

Key Insights:

  • The HERS trial contradicted observational data suggesting menopausal estrogen therapy prevents heart disease.
  • Conflicting outcomes in randomized clinical trials for tamoxifen's breast cancer prevention (NSABP P-1 vs. Royal Marsden Hospital) underscore the impact of study design and execution.
  • Reconciling evidence across different study designs is crucial for establishing scientific truth.

Outlook:

  • Further research is needed to resolve discrepancies between observational and randomized trial findings regarding menopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular health.
  • Investigating the reasons for conflicting results within randomized clinical trials for tamoxifen efficacy is essential for clinical practice.
  • Developing robust methodologies to synthesize evidence from diverse study designs will enhance the reliability of scientific conclusions.