Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative study designs used in quality improvement and assessment.

W S Ormes1, M B Brim, P Coggan

  • 1Michigan Department of Corrections, USA.

Journal for Healthcare Quality : Official Publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
|May 31, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Healthcare quality professionals can improve data analysis by understanding quantitative design techniques. Evaluating study designs helps identify threats to inferring cause-and-effect relationships for accurate quality improvement assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Managing the pharmaceutical industry-health system interface.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy·2002
Same author

A comparative study of chiropractic and medical education.

Alternative therapies in health and medicine·1998
Same author

Medical education and marketplace competition.

JAMA·1997
Same author

The process of faculty-mentored student research in family medicine: motives and lessons.

Family medicine·1994
Same author

Community of scholars, family medicine, and the academic imperative.

Family medicine·1988
Same author

Effect of diazepam on the speed of mental rotation.

Psychopharmacology·1987

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Health Services Research
  • Quantitative Research Methods

Background:

  • Effective quality improvement in healthcare relies on robust data collection and analysis.
  • Understanding quantitative design limitations is crucial for accurate interpretation of quality data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe common quantitative design techniques for healthcare quality data.
  • To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of various study designs.
  • To identify threats to inferring cause-and-effect relationships in quality improvement research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common quantitative research design techniques.
  • Analysis of factors threatening the interpretability of quality data.
  • Assessment of advantages and disadvantages of different study designs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Quantitative designs vary in their ability to establish causality.
  • Confounding circumstances can compromise the analysis of process improvements.
  • Identifying and excluding alternative factors is essential for validating quality improvements.

Conclusions:

  • Healthcare quality professionals must critically assess quantitative designs to avoid misinterpreting data.
  • Accurate assessment of process improvement requires careful consideration of confounding factors.
  • Understanding design limitations enhances the reliability of quality improvement initiatives.