Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Referrals to clinical mammography in a county without screening program].

H O Birk1, L O Henriksen, H Lindewald

  • 1Billeddiagnostisk afdeling, Amtssygehuset Roskilde.

Ugeskrift for Laeger
|May 31, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mortality in joggers. Healthy jogger effect might explain differences in mortality.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2001
Same author

Renal stones and primary hyperparathyroidism: natural history of renal stone disease after successful parathyroidectomy.

World journal of surgery·1999
Same author

Inhibition of the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced increase in vitamin D receptor (VDR) levels and binding of VDR-retinoid X receptor (RXR) to a direct repeat (DR)-3 type response element by an RXR-specific ligand in human keratinocyte cultures.

Biochemical pharmacology·1998
Same author

A new treatment of ruptured Achilles tendons. A prospective randomized study.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·1994
Same author

Risk of accidental exposure to blood borne infection during plastic surgical operations.

Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery·1994
Same author

[Desmoid tumor of the abdominal wall].

Ugeskrift for laeger·1994
Same journal

[Mosaicism as a cause of Cowden syndrome].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same journal

[Thyrotoxic crisis with cardiogenic shock].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same journal

[Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in the treatment of depression].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same journal

[Fitness].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same journal

[Risk of developing cataract related to fluoroscopy].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same journal

[Obturator hernia with small bowel ileus presenting as hip pain in an elderly woman].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
See all related articles

Systematic mammography screening can decrease unindicated diagnostic mammograms. Biennial screening for women aged 50-69 could reduce diagnostic mammograms by 338 annually, with further reductions possible through GP cooperation.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Mammography screening is a key tool for early breast cancer detection.
  • Unindicated diagnostic mammograms contribute to healthcare system burden.
  • Optimizing screening protocols is crucial for efficient resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of systematic mammography screening on reducing unindicated diagnostic mammograms.
  • To assess the yield of mammography in different patient groups (no indication, risk group, clinical indication).
  • To estimate potential reductions in diagnostic mammograms through optimized screening strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of mammography data from 6285 women over a four-year period.
  • Categorization of women based on clinical indication, risk factors, and mammography findings.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculation of potential reductions in diagnostic mammograms based on screening age groups and GP collaboration.

    • Main Results:

    • 24% of mammograms were performed without clinical indication.
    • Breast cancer detection rates varied: 0.46% (no indication), 1.2% (risk group), 8.9% (clinical indication).
    • Biennial screening for women aged 50-69 could reduce diagnostic mammograms by 338 annually; further 171 reductions possible with GP cooperation for younger women.

    Conclusions:

    • Systematic mammography screening can significantly reduce the number of unindicated diagnostic mammograms.
    • Targeted screening in specific age and risk groups improves detection efficiency.
    • While reducing unindicated procedures is beneficial, direct cost savings in radiology departments may not be the primary driver for implementing screening programs.