Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pancreatic carcinoma: imaging update 2001.

P C Freeny1

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash. 98195, USA. freeny@u.washington.edu

Digestive Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 1, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Atlanta Classification of acute pancreatitis revisited.

The British journal of surgery·2007
Same author

Significance of hyperattenuating and contrast-enhancing hepatic nodules detected in the cirrhotic liver during arterial phase helical CT in pre-liver transplant patients: radiologic-histopathologic correlation of explanted livers.

Abdominal imaging·2003
Same author

Pancreatic carcinoma: what is the best imaging test?

Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]·2002
Same author

Safety and efficacy of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the U.S. multicenter phase III clinical trials (safety).

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2000
Same author

Pancreaticoduodenal arcades and dorsal pancreatic artery: comparison of CT angiography with three-dimensional volume rendering, maximum intensity projection, and shaded-surface display.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·1999
Same author

Pancreatic imaging. New modalities.

Gastroenterology clinics of North America·1999

Helical computed tomography (HCT) is the most effective imaging technique for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer, offering high accuracy. Other methods like MRI and PET are valuable for specific patient groups and detecting spread.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Pancreatic cancer diagnosis and staging rely heavily on advanced imaging techniques.
  • Accurate staging is crucial for determining treatment strategies and patient prognosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advancements in imaging modalities for pancreatic carcinomas.
  • To compare the efficacy and applications of different imaging techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of helical computed tomography (HCT) with CT angiography.
  • Review of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
  • Evaluation of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • HCT demonstrates high accuracy (95-97%) for pancreatic cancer detection and near-perfect staging of unresectable tumors.
  • CT staging accuracy for resectable tumors is 80-85%, with missed metastases being a limitation.
  • MRI/MRCP are useful for patients with contraindications to HCT contrast or equivocal HCT findings.
  • PET imaging aids in detecting extrapancreatic nodal metastases.

Conclusions:

  • Helical computed tomography is the preferred modality for initial detection and staging of pancreatic cancer.
  • MRI, MRCP, and PET serve as valuable complementary tools for specific clinical scenarios in pancreatic cancer imaging.