Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.

R L Freyman1, U Balakrishnan, K S Helfer

  • 1Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003, USA. RLF@comdis.umass.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|June 2, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Firefighters' hearing: a comparison with population databases from the International Standards Organization.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2001
Same author

The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Continuing education in audiology: what do we want?

American journal of audiology·1999
Same author

The influence of broadband noise on the precedence effect.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1998
Same author

Auditory and auditory-visual recognition of clear and conversational speech by older adults.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1998
Same author

Sudden changes in spectrum of an echo cause a breakdown of the precedence effect.

Perception & psychophysics·1998
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Perceived spatial separation of speech and interference significantly improves speech recognition. This benefit holds even when the interfering speech is not fully intelligible.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Speech processing
  • Psychoacoustics

Background:

  • Understanding speech in noisy environments is challenging.
  • Spatial separation of sound sources can aid speech intelligibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how perceived spatial separation between target speech and interfering speech affects speech recognition.
  • To determine if this benefit extends to non-intelligible interfering speech.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using grammatically correct, nonmeaningful sentences as target speech.
  • Interference conditions included same-location (F-F) and spatially separated (F-RF) female talkers, leveraging the precedence effect.
  • Noise modulated by masker envelopes was used in a control experiment.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Sizable improvements in speech recognition were observed when interference was spatially separated (F-RF) compared to co-located (F-F).
  • This advantage was present for both single- and two-talker interference.
  • No benefit of spatial separation was found when interference was modulated noise.

Conclusions:

  • Perceived spatial separation of speech and interference enhances speech recognition.
  • The benefit of spatial separation is robust and does not require the interfering speech to be fully intelligible.