Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

New Injectable Composites for Bone Replacementd.

Pierre Hardouin1, Jaques Lemaitre

  • 1Institut de Recherche sur les Maladies du Squelette, (IRMS), France.

Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Designing molecular RNA switches with Restricted Boltzmann machines.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

A Multiscale Study to Characterize SHAPE Probe/RNA Molecules Prereactive Complex and Its Role in Initiating the SHAPE Reaction.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

IPANEMAP Suite: a pipeline for probing-informed RNA structure modeling.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2025
Same author

SHAPE Probing to Screen Computationally Designed RNA.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2024
Same author

RNA Secondary Structure Modeling Following the IPANEMAP Workflow.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2024
Same author

Structural Insights into the Dimeric Form of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> RNase Y Using NMR and AlphaFold.

Biomolecules·2022
Same journal

History of MSK Section of the Italian Society of Radiology.

Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology·2026
Same journal

Principles of Anatomy and Function in Wrist Imaging.

Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology·2026
Same journal

Opportunistic Screening Based on Computed Tomography in Musculoskeletal Radiology: How and Why.

Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal Computed Tomography Imaging: A 30-Year Perspective.

Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology·2026
Same journal

Current Advances and Controversies in Spine Imaging.

Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology·2026
Same journal

New Techniques in Musculoskeletal MRI: State of the Art.

Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology·2026
See all related articles

Injectable bone cements offer biocompatibility and controlled drug delivery for bone repair. While mechanical properties need improvement, these novel biomaterials show great potential for diverse orthopedic applications.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Engineering
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Injectable composites represent a novel class of biomaterials for bone replacement.
  • These materials include injectable ceramics and calcium phosphate hydraulic cements (e.g., calcium deficient hydroxyapatite, dahllite, brushite cements).
  • Key advantages include biocompatibility, resorbability, osteoconductivity, and injectability for minimally invasive delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the emerging field of injectable composite biomaterials for bone replacement.
  • To highlight their advantages, potential applications, and current limitations.
  • To emphasize the need for further biological and clinical evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of injectable ceramic and calcium phosphate hydraulic cements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of material properties, including injectability, biocompatibility, and mechanical strength.
  • Exploration of potential clinical applications and drug delivery capabilities.

    • Main Results:

    • Injectable bone cements offer significant advantages for bone repair and augmentation.
    • Potential for controlled delivery of therapeutic agents like antibiotics and bone morphogenetic proteins.
    • Mechanical properties are currently inferior to traditional polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement but show potential for enhancement.

    Conclusions:

    • Injectable composite biomaterials hold significant promise for bone replacement therapies.
    • Further research is required to optimize mechanical properties and conduct comprehensive biological and clinical studies.
    • Broad clinical applications are anticipated in implantology, bone surgery, traumatology, interventional radiology, and rheumatology.