Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the Toronto stentless porcine valve
B S Goldman1, T E David, J R Wood
1Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. bernard.goldman@swchsc.on.ca
Background:
Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto stentless porcine valve have been documented. Clinical well-being and freedom from major valve-related events have been less well defined.
Methods:
A total of 447 patients were prospectively followed for up to 8 years (1,745.2 valve years total, 3.9 valve years/patient). The patient demographics included 66% men, mean age 65 years, New York Heart Association functional class III-IV 55%, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting 41%.
Results:
We found that 83.7% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I and 80.8% had 0 to 1+ aortic insufficiency. Mean gradient at 6 years (n = 75) was 4.4 mm Hg and mean effective orifice area (EOA) 2.4 cm2. Late adverse event rates per patient per year were: embolism 1.0%, endocarditis 0.4%, thrombosis 0%, structural deterioration 0.2%, explant 0.3%, and valve-related death 0.6%. Freedom from valve-related death at 6 years was 95.8%; from cardiac death 96.3%. Freedom from endocarditis was 98.4%, from embolism 93.9%, from structural deterioration 97.4%, and freedom from explant 98.1%. For patients older than 60 years, freedom from structural deterioration was 100%.
Conclusions:
These results confirm satisfactory clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the Toronto stentless porcine valve, with a low incidence of valve-related adverse events as long as 96 months after valve replacement.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

