Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
Published on: November 3, 2011
Optimal classification of protein sequences and selection of representative sets from multiple alignments:
1Division of Mathematical Biology, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 lAA, UK. amay@nimr.mrc.ac.uk
Abstract:
Hierarchical classification is probably the most popular approach to group related proteins. However, there are a number of problems associated with its use for this purpose. One is that the resulting tree showing a nested sequence of groups may not be the most suitable representation of the data. Another is that visual inspection is the most common method to decide the most appropriate number of subsets from a tree. In fact, classification of proteins in general is bedevilled with the need for subjective thresholds to define group membership (e.g., 'significant' sequence identity for homologous families). Such arbitrariness is not only intellectually unsatisfying but also has important practical consequences. For instance, it hinders meaningful identification of protein targets for structural genomics. I describe an alternative approach to cluster related proteins without the need for an a priori threshold: one, through its use of dynamic programming, which is guaranteed to produce globally optimal solutions at all levels of partition granularity. Grouping proteins according to weights assigned to their aligned sequences makes it possible to delineate dynamically a 'core-periphery' structure within families. The 'core' of a protein family comprises the most typical sequences while the 'periphery' consists of the atypical ones. Further, a new sequence weighting scheme that combines the information in all the multiply aligned positions of an alignment in a novel way is put forward. Instead of averaging over all positions, this procedure takes into account directly the distribution of sequence variability along an alignment. The relationships between sequence weights and sequence identity are investigated for 168 families taken from HOMSTRAD, a database of protein structure alignments for homologous families. An exact solution is presented for the problem of how to select the most representative pair of sequences for a protein family. Extension of this approach by a greedy algorithm allows automatic identification of a minimal set of aligned sequences. The results of this analysis are available on the Web at http://mathbio.nimr.mrc.ac.uk/~amay.
More Related Videos
07:49Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
Published on: August 16, 2017
05:08Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Protein Families
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to form...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Genome Annotation and Assembly
Protein Families
Microbial Phylogeny