Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Concurrent and retroactive interference effects in memory of movement patterns.

T Helstrup1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Box 1094 Blindern, N-0317, Oslo, Norway. tore.helstrup@psykologi.uio.no

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|June 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study investigated memory for movement patterns. Experiments found no evidence for motor mechanisms influencing memory recall for enacted or observed movements, challenging action memory theories.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of strategies and contexts on memory for movement patterns.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2000
Same author

Pop-out into memory: a retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

Do you remember what you imagined you would do in that place? The motor encoding cue-failure effect in sighted and blind people.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·1994
Same author

Visual discovery in mind and on paper.

Memory & cognition·1993
Same author

Loci for act recall: contextual influence on the processing of action events.

Psychological research·1989
Same author

Concept formation and language acquisition. The influence of task complexity and strategy factors.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·1977
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Understanding the mechanisms underlying memory for actions is crucial for cognitive and neuroscience research.
  • Previous theories suggest motor system involvement in remembering performed actions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether motor mechanisms play a role in memory for enacted and observed movement patterns.
  • To differentiate the impact of motor versus non-motor interference tasks on movement memory.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted comparing memory recall for movement patterns.
  • Visuo-spatial tracing tasks (motor) were contrasted with articulatory suppression and backward counting (non-motor interference tasks).

Main Results:

  • No significant indices of motor mechanisms were detected in the memory of movement patterns across all experiments.
  • Interference tasks did not differentially affect memory recall based on motor involvement.

Conclusions:

  • The findings do not support the hypothesis that motor mechanisms are essential for memory of movement patterns.
  • Results suggest that memory for actions may rely more on cognitive and problem-solving processes than previously theorized.