Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic radical/total nephrectomy: a decade of progress.

A J Portis1, M Elnady, R V Clayman

  • 1Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

Journal of Endourology
|June 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumors is effective, offering less pain and disability than open surgery. While operative times are comparable, costs and efficiency require further evaluation for this evolving minimally invasive technique.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laparoscopic renal surgery.

Minerva chirurgica·2009
Same author

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Surgical endoscopy·2005
Same author

Should laparoscopy be the standard approach used for radical nephrectomy?

Current urology reports·2002
Same author

Dual-organ ablative surgery using a hand-assisted laparoscopic technique. A report of four cases.

Surgical endoscopy·2002
Same author

Assessment of optimal balloon size for rupture of the ureteropelvic junction and mid-ureter in a porcine model.

Journal of endourology·2002
Same author

Laparoscopic management of retrovesical cystic disease: Washington University experience and review of the literature.

Journal of endourology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) has evolved significantly since its inception in 1990.
  • Numerous surgical innovations have refined LRN techniques, including transperitoneal, hand-assisted, and retroperitoneal approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current state of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
  • To evaluate the efficacy, efficiency, morbidity, and cost of LRN compared to open surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Review of operative and postoperative data for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
  • Analysis of available follow-up data for tumor-free outcomes.

Main Results:

  • LRN appears as effective as open surgery in achieving tumor-free status.

Related Experiment Videos

  • LRN demonstrates reduced postoperative pain and disability compared to open procedures.
  • Operative times for LRN are approaching those of open surgery, but intraoperative costs remain higher.

    • Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a viable, less morbid alternative to open surgery for renal tumors.
    • Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term efficiency and cost-effectiveness of LRN.
    • The benefits of decreased hospitalization and convalescence must be weighed against higher initial costs.