Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distributing working memory resources during problem solving.

M Cary1, R A Carlson

  • 1Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. mcary@andrew.cmu.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|June 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A unified theory for psychologists?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
Same author

Linking abuse and recovery through advocacy: an observational study.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2013
Same author

The role of worker participation in effective training.

New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS·2012
Same author

Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis: comparing fecal culture versus serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and direct fecal polymerase chain reaction.

Journal of dairy science·2008
Same author

Geostatistical based monitoring of soil water NO3- -N: a potential nonpoint source of ground water contamination.

Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering·2002
Same author

Regulation of capsule gene expression by group A Streptococcus during pharyngeal colonization and invasive infection.

Molecular microbiology·2001
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Problem solvers strategically use external notes to manage working memory, recording fewer results when note-taking is difficult. Goal structure and note layout influence how individuals balance internal and external cognitive resources.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Working Memory Research

Background:

  • Working memory is crucial for cognitive tasks, but its capacity is limited.
  • External aids like note-taking can offload cognitive demands.
  • Understanding how individuals utilize these external resources is key to optimizing problem-solving.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how individuals distribute working memory load between internal (mental) and external (notes) resources during an arithmetic task.
  • To identify factors influencing the use and effectiveness of external note-taking strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed an arithmetic task while recording intermediate results and their labels in notes.
  • Experimental manipulations included varying the effort required for note-taking, goal structure (consistent vs. varied), and spatial arrangement of notes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data collected included the number of recorded results and the labeling of these results.

    • Main Results:

    • Participants recorded a majority of intermediate results, often labeling them.
    • Increased effort in note-taking led to fewer recorded results.
    • Consistent goal structures and spatial arrangements resulted in fewer labeled notes, suggesting implicit indexing strategies.
    • Individuals adapted their note-taking based on situational costs and benefits.

    Conclusions:

    • Individuals flexibly allocate working memory demands across internal and external resources.
    • Both explicit (labeling) and implicit (spatial, goal-based) strategies are employed for managing intermediate results.
    • Cognitive offloading through note-taking is a dynamic process influenced by task difficulty and organizational factors.