Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Toxicologists -- come out and educate!

A M Monro1

  • 1camonro@dial.pipex.com

Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
|June 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Toxicologists need to improve public understanding of chemical risk assessment. Misinterpreting dose-response and hazard versus risk leads to wasted resources on minor environmental threats.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aryloxyalkylaminoguanidines. Their synthesis and biological properties.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2011
Same author

Rodent carcinogenicity tests need be no longer than 18 months: an analysis based on 210 chemicals in the IARC monographs.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2000
Same author

Veterinary drugs no longer need testing for carcinogenicity in rodent bioassays.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·1999
Same author

Evaluation of the toxicity of drug residues in food: the case for 'relay' toxicity studies.

Food additives and contaminants·1998
Same author

Evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals. Opportunities arising from the International Conference on Harmonisation.

Drug safety·1998
Same author

The safety assessment of drug residues at injection sites.

Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics·1996

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment Science

Background:

  • Public and governmental understanding of chemical hazards is often poor.
  • Basic toxicological principles like dose-response are frequently misunderstood.
  • Distinctions between hazard, risk, and causal relationships are not widely grasped.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the critical need for toxicologists to enhance public and governmental comprehension of chemical risk.
  • To address the misallocation of resources due to a lack of understanding of quantitative toxicology.
  • To advocate for improved communication of scientific concepts to non-experts.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of current public and governmental understanding of environmental chemical hazards.
  • Evaluation of the consequences of misunderstanding toxicological principles.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of key concepts requiring better communication.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant public and governmental ignorance regarding quantitative aspects of chemical hazards.
    • Misapplication of resources towards trivial or non-existent hazards.
    • A clear need for improved dissemination of toxicological knowledge.

    Conclusions:

    • Toxicologists must actively educate journalists, the public, and policymakers on dose-response, hazard vs. risk, and causality.
    • Enhanced communication is crucial to prevent misspent public funds on insignificant chemical risks.
    • Professional toxicologists should prioritize outreach to improve risk management decisions.