Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Heterotypic smooth muscle cell/endothelial cell interactions differ between species.

O J Imegwu1, I Entersz, A M Graham

  • 1Division of Vascular Surgery, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019, USA.

The Journal of Surgical Research
|June 9, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study compared how human and bovine cells interact in a lab setting. Researchers found that human endothelial cells slowed the growth of both themselves and smooth muscle cells when cultured together. In contrast, bovine cells actually increased smooth muscle cell growth. The experiments used special membranes to separate the cells while allowing them to communicate. The results suggest that animal models may not always predict human cell behavior accurately. This highlights the importance of using human cells in studies that aim to understand cell interactions and their effects on growth.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of navitoclax (ABT-263), a dual inhibitor of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL , in patients with cancer.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2014
Same author

Chronic homocysteine exposure upregulates endothelial adhesion molecules and mediates leukocyte: endothelial cell interactions under flow conditions.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2010
Same author

Role of ischaemic preconditioning in liver regeneration following major liver resection and transplantation.

World journal of gastroenterology·2007
Same author

Predictors of health after operation for aortoiliac occlusive and aneurysmal disease.

Surgery·2001
Same author

Human monoclonal anti-endothelial cell IgG-derived from a systemic lupus erythematosus patient binds and activates human endothelium in vitro.

International immunology·2001
Same author

Predictors of health after revascularization for extremity ischemia.

Surgery·2000

Area of Science:

  • Cell biology and tissue engineering
  • Comparative physiology in in vitro models
  • Endothelial and smooth muscle cell interactions

Background:

In vitro models are frequently used to explore how different cell types interact. While these models have provided insights into cellular behavior, the influence of species origin on these interactions remains unclear. Prior research has shown that cell-cell communication can affect growth and function, but whether these effects differ between species is less established. This uncertainty drives the need for comparative studies using human and animal cells. The role of endothelial and smooth muscle cells in vascular function is well documented, but how their interactions vary across species is not fully understood. Researchers have long sought to determine if in vitro findings from animal models accurately reflect human biology. The availability of human and bovine cells allows for direct comparisons in coculture systems. However, the extent to which species-specific differences impact these interactions has not been thoroughly examined. This gap motivates investigations into the species dependence of heterotypic cell interactions.

Keywords:
cell cocultureendothelial cell functionspecies-specific cell interactionsin vitro cell growth

Frequently Asked Questions

Human endothelial cells inhibited both their own and smooth muscle cell growth in coculture, while bovine cells stimulated smooth muscle cell growth.

Endothelial cells were cultured on porous Dacron membranes, with smooth muscle cells added either on the same side or opposite side after three days.

The study found that human and bovine cells behave differently in coculture, suggesting species-specific signaling pathways affect growth dynamics.

The membranes allowed for spatial separation of cell types while enabling indirect communication through paracrine signaling.

Related Experiment Videos

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to determine whether the species of origin influences heterotypic interactions between smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells in coculture. Researchers hypothesized that differences in these interactions could affect cell proliferation rates. The primary goal was to compare human and bovine cells in a controlled in vitro model. By isolating these interactions, the team sought to clarify if species-specific factors alter growth dynamics. The use of porous Dacron membranes allowed for spatial separation of cell types while permitting indirect communication. The study also aimed to assess whether endothelial cells influence smooth muscle cell proliferation and vice versa. By measuring growth rates under different coculture conditions, the researchers aimed to identify species-specific patterns. This approach could help determine the relevance of animal models in human-related studies.

Main Methods:

The study used human and bovine aortic cells in coculture experiments. Porous Dacron membranes were employed to separate endothelial and smooth muscle cells while allowing for indirect interactions. In one setup, endothelial cells were cultured on membranes, and smooth muscle cells were added either on the same side or opposite side after three days. Cell counts were taken after four days to assess proliferation. In a second setup, smooth muscle cells were plated first, followed by endothelial cells two days later. Growth was measured after 48 hours. Three replicates per condition were tested, with experiments repeated twice. The cell density was standardized at 5 x 10^5 cells per membrane. The experimental design allowed for comparisons between human and bovine cells under identical conditions. This approach enabled the researchers to isolate the effects of species-specific interactions on cell growth.

Main Results:

Human endothelial cells reduced the growth of both endothelial and smooth muscle cells in coculture. Endothelial cell growth was 55.2% lower in coculture compared to monoculture. Smooth muscle cell growth was 27.2% lower in coculture compared to monoculture. In contrast, bovine endothelial cells stimulated smooth muscle cell proliferation. Bovine smooth muscle cells showed a 66.8% increase in growth when cocultured with endothelial cells. Bovine endothelial cells did not significantly reduce smooth muscle cell growth. These findings indicate species-specific differences in heterotypic interactions. The growth inhibition observed in human cocultures was not seen in bovine cocultures. These results suggest that in vitro interactions are not universally applicable across species. The observed differences highlight the importance of using human cells in studies involving cell-cell interactions.

Conclusions:

The study found that heterotypic interactions between smooth muscle and endothelial cells differ significantly between species. Human cells exhibited a coinhibitory effect on growth in coculture. Bovine cells, in contrast, showed stimulatory effects on smooth muscle cell proliferation. These findings align with the known differences in cell-material interactions between species. The authors suggest that using human cells in in vitro studies is crucial for accurate results. The coinhibitory effect in human cocultures may reflect species-specific regulatory mechanisms. The stimulatory effect in bovine cocultures indicates divergent signaling pathways. These results support the idea that animal models may not fully represent human biology. The authors emphasize the need for species-specific considerations in in vitro research.

Human smooth muscle cells showed 27.2% less growth in coculture, while bovine cells showed 66.8% more growth under the same conditions.

The findings suggest that using human cells in in vitro studies is essential to avoid misleading results from animal models.