Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

qPCR Is a Sensitive and Rapid Method for Detection of Cytomegaloviral DNA in Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Biopsy Tissue
Published on: July 10, 2014
Ability of three IgG-avidity assays to exclude recent cytomegalovirus infection
1Department of Microbiology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. Bodeus@mblg.ucl.ac.be
At present, the measurement of IgG avidity appears to be the best method for differentiating primary from nonprimary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. This study compared the performances of three denaturation assays for the measurement of CMV IgG avidity: an in-house method and the commercially available assays Enzygnost (Dade-Behring, Germany) and Vidas (bioMérieux, France). The ability of these assays to exclude or to detect a recent CMV infection were calculated according to the results obtained in two control groups of pregnant women: 49 who had seroconverted and 80 with past infections. All three assays demonstrated a good ability to detect a recent infection (98-100%). The Dade-Behring test, in its present form, appears to be ineffective in excluding a recent CMV infection (exclusion ability: 30%), while the in-house method (exclusion ability: 96%) and the bioMérieux method (exclusion ability: 82%) performed better. The practical use of the in-house and the bioMérieux assays was evaluated in 80 women with CMV-specific IgG and a positive IgM result but without documented seroconversion. At the recommended diagnostic thresholds, the concordance between these two tests was 70%. Larger studies will allow more precise determination of the capacities of both assays and specification of the diagnostic thresholds or grey areas to be used.
At present, the measurement of IgG avidity appears to be the best method for differentiating primary from nonprimary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. This study compared the performances of three denaturation assays for the measurement of CMV IgG avidity: an in-house method and the commercially available assays Enzygnost (Dade-Behring, Germany) and Vidas (bioMérieux, France). The ability of these assays to exclude or to detect a recent CMV infection were calculated according to the results obtained in two control groups of pregnant women: 49 who had seroconverted and 80 with past infections. All three assays demonstrated a good ability to detect a recent infection (98-100%). The Dade-Behring test, in its present form, appears to be ineffective in excluding a recent CMV infection (exclusion ability: 30%), while the in-house method (exclusion ability: 96%) and the bioMérieux method (exclusion ability: 82%) performed better. The practical use of the in-house and the bioMérieux assays was evaluated in 80 women with CMV-specific IgG and a positive IgM result but without documented seroconversion. At the recommended diagnostic thresholds, the concordance between these two tests was 70%. Larger studies will allow more precise determination of the capacities of both assays and specification of the diagnostic thresholds or grey areas to be used.
More Related Videos
08:04Development of an IFN-γ ELISpot Assay to Assess Varicella-Zoster Virus-specific Cell-mediated Immunity Following Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
Published on: July 10, 2014
09:12A Protein Microarray Assay for Serological Determination of Antigen-specific Antibody Responses Following Clostridium difficile Infection
Published on: June 15, 2018