Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lower Prepregnancy Cardiovascular Health is Associated With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: The CARDIA Study.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2025
Same author

Response to Comment on: A liberalized diet does not improve caloric intake during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplants: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition·2025
Same author

Physical Activity Compliance to American Cancer Society Recommendations Amongst Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Survivors.

Hematology/oncology and stem cell therapy·2023
Same author

Qualifying Certainty in Radiology Reports through Deep Learning-Based Natural Language Processing.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2021
Same author

Baseline brain function in the preadolescents of the ABCD Study.

Nature neuroscience·2021
Same author

Gendered Race and Setting Matter: Sources of Complexity in the Relationships Between Reported Interpersonal Discrimination and Cardiovascular Health in the CARDIA Study.

Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial.

C I Kiefe1, J J Allison, O D Williams

  • 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1717 11th Ave S, MT 700, Birmingham, AL 35205-4785, USA. ckiefe@uab.edu

JAMA
|June 13, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Achievable Benchmarks of Care (ABCs) significantly improved physician performance feedback and patient care quality in a randomized trial. This quality improvement intervention demonstrated enhanced effectiveness when incorporating benchmark data for healthcare providers.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
09:16

Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

Published on: May 12, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
09:16

Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

Published on: May 12, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Medical Performance Measurement
  • Clinical Practice Management

Background:

  • Performance feedback and benchmarking are crucial for healthcare improvement but infrequently evaluated in randomized trials.
  • Achievable Benchmarks of Care (ABCs) represent attainable standards of excellence derived from peer performance data.
  • ABCs are easily calculated from existing performance data, offering a reproducible method for quality assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the impact of using achievable benchmarks to augment standard physician performance feedback.
  • To determine if achievable benchmarks can lead to measurable improvements in patient care.

Main Methods:

  • A group-randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 1996 to 1998.
  • Seventy community physicians and 2978 Medicare patients with diabetes were enrolled.
  • Physicians received either standard feedback or feedback augmented with achievable benchmark data.

Main Results:

  • The experimental group showed significant improvements in influenza vaccination rates (40% to 58%) compared to the control group (40% to 46%).
  • Achievable benchmark physicians had higher odds of providing appropriate care, including foot examinations and glucose control monitoring.
  • The intervention demonstrated statistically significant positive effects on cholesterol and triglyceride monitoring after adjusting for physician characteristics.

Conclusions:

  • The integration of achievable benchmarks substantially enhances the effectiveness of physician performance feedback.
  • This approach offers a valuable strategy for improving the quality of care in clinical settings.
  • Achievable benchmarks provide a data-driven method to drive meaningful quality improvements in healthcare.