In vitro studies of the efficacy of antimicrobials against fungi

T F Meiller1, J I Kelley, M A Jabra-Rizk

  • 1Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Unversity of Maryland Dental School, Balitmore, Md 21201, USA. TFM001@dental.umaryland.edu

Abstract

Insights

Listerine Antiseptic and other mouthrinses effectively combat pathogenic fungi. Listerine Antiseptic demonstrated superior performance against fungal biofilms, suggesting potential for reducing oral fungal colonization.

Area of Science:

  • Oral microbiology
  • Antimicrobial efficacy testing
  • Mycology

Background:

  • Pathogenic fungi can cause oral infections.
  • Antiseptic mouthrinses are commonly used for oral hygiene.
  • Controlling fungal growth in the oral cavity is important for preventing infections.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the antifungal efficacy of Listerine Antiseptic, Tartar Control Listerine Antiseptic, and Peridex mouthrinses against pathogenic fungi.
  • To evaluate a 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate solution as a control.

Main Methods:

  • Standardized antimicrobial efficacy testing methods were employed.
  • Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) were determined using macrobroth dilutions.
  • Suspension kill-time assays and effectiveness against artificial biofilm-attached fungal populations were assessed.

Main Results:

  • All tested mouthrinses and the chlorhexidine solution exhibited efficacy against the target fungal species at commercial concentrations.
  • Listerine Antiseptic demonstrated superior effectiveness in eliminating artificial biofilm-attached fungal populations compared to the other agents.

Conclusions:

  • Listerine Antiseptic, Tartar Control Listerine Antiseptic, and Peridex mouthrinses show potential for controlling pathogenic oral fungi.
  • These mouthrinses may be beneficial in reducing oral fungal colonization and preventing associated infections.