Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique.

I S Gill1, C D Zippe

  • 1Sections of Laparoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

The Urologic Clinics of North America
|June 14, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply by Authors.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Reply by Authors.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Association between Smoking Exposure, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response and Survival Outcomes following Radical Cystectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Live surgery: highly educational or harmful?

World journal of urology·2017
Same author

Standardization of definitions in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a Delphi consensus project.

World journal of urology·2016
Same author

Axl receptor tyrosine kinase is a potential therapeutic target in renal cell carcinoma.

British journal of cancer·2015

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy shows short-term oncologic and urinary continence outcomes comparable to open surgery. Patients may experience improved postoperative quality of life, though longer follow-up is needed for potency assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Laparoscopy is increasingly used for complex oncologic surgeries, including radical prostatectomy.
  • Trained urologists can now perform laparoscopic radical prostatectomy effectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open surgery.
  • To assess oncologic and functional outcomes, including urinary continence and potency.
  • To analyze the learning curve and operative time for this procedure.

Main Methods:

  • The study involved performing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by trained urologists.
  • Data on oncologic and functional outcomes (urinary continence, potency) were collected and compared to open surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Operative time and the learning curve were analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • Short-term oncologic and urinary continence rates appear equivalent to open surgery.
    • Initial operative times are lengthy (> 7 hours) but improve with experience.
    • The learning curve is approximately 50 cases.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a feasible technique with comparable short-term efficacy to open surgery.
    • Nerve-sparing techniques can be integrated due to excellent visualization.
    • Preliminary patient-reported outcomes suggest improved postoperative quality of life.