Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.

M J Kane1, M K Bleckley, A R Conway

  • 1Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, USA. mjkane@uncg.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|June 21, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Individual differences in working-memory (WM) capacity are linked to attentional control. Lower WM capacity correlates with poorer performance in tasks requiring focused attention and task switching.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Statistical challenges posed by uncontrolled master protocols: sensitivity analysis of the vemurafenib study.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2018
Same author

Brain serotonin determines maternal behavior and offspring survival.

Genes, brain, and behavior·2014
Same author

On the time course of negative priming: Another look.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Dissociable brain mechanisms for inhibitory control: effects of interference content and working memory capacity.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2003
Same author

The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration.

Memory & cognition·2001

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Working memory (WM) capacity is crucial for cognitive functions.
  • Attentional control is vital for task performance and goal achievement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between individual differences in working-memory capacity and attentional control.
  • To determine if working-memory capacity predicts performance on tasks demanding attentional control.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving participants with high and low working-memory spans.
  • Tasks included prosaccade, antisaccade, and task-switching paradigms, with eye movements monitored.
  • Performance metrics included accuracy, reaction time, and saccade errors.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Low-span participants showed deficits in the antisaccade task compared to high-span participants.
  • Eye movement analysis revealed slower and more erroneous saccades in low-span individuals.
  • Poor performance was observed in low-span participants during task switching from antisaccade to prosaccade.

Conclusions:

  • Working-memory capacity is significantly related to attentional control.
  • Findings support a controlled-attention model of working memory.
  • Individual differences in WM capacity impact the ability to direct and maintain attention.