Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Intracellular Hormone Receptors01:08

Intracellular Hormone Receptors

Lipid-soluble hormones diffuse across the plasma and nuclear membrane of target cells to bind to their specific intracellular receptors. These receptors act as transcription factors that regulate gene expression and protein synthesis in the target cell
Adrenergic Receptors: ɑ Subtype01:31

Adrenergic Receptors: ɑ Subtype

Adrenoceptors are classified into α and ꞵ classes based on their potencies to catecholamine agonists. α-adrenoceptors show the following order of catecholamine potency:
Adrenaline ≥ Noradrenaline >> Isoprenaline
α-adrenoceptors are further divided into α1 and α2-adrenoceptors.
α1-Adrenoceptors: These receptors are located postsynaptically on the effector organs and cause constriction of smooth muscle mediated by activation of phospholipase C—inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate...
Adrenergic Receptors: β Subtype01:26

Adrenergic Receptors: β Subtype

β-adrenoceptors have varied sensitivities towards adrenaline, noradrenaline, and isoprenaline. The order of agonist potency is as follows:
Isoprenaline > Adrenaline > Noradrenaline
Neurotransmitter binding to these receptors causes activation of adenylyl cyclase resulting in increased concentrations of cAMP and modulation of calcium ion channels within the cell. They are further classified into β1, β2, and β3 subtypes.
β1-adrenoceptors: β1-adrenoceptors have equal affinities for...
Accessory Glands of the Male Reproductive System01:16

Accessory Glands of the Male Reproductive System

The accessory ducts involved in sperm maturation and transportation include the epididymides, vasa deferentia, ejaculatory ducts, and urethra. These ducts play a critical role in the maturation, storage, and transportation of sperm from the testes to the urethra, where it is then released during ejaculation.
The epididymis is a small, comma-shaped organ located at the back of each testicle. The epididymis can be divided into three main parts: the head, body, and tail. The head of the epididymis...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cytogenetic and pathologic aspects of Ewing's sarcoma and neuroectodermal tumors.

Human pathology·1992
Same author

Translocation (X;1)(p11.2;q21). A subtype of renal adenocarcinomas.

Cancer genetics and cytogenetics·1992
Same author

Cytogenetic and molecular studies of a familial renal cell carcinoma.

Cancer genetics and cytogenetics·1992
Same author

Cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of breast fibroadenomas.

Cancer genetics and cytogenetics·1992
Same author

Application of fluorescence in situ hybridization in hematological disorders.

Cancer genetics and cytogenetics·1992
Same author

Cytogenetic and FISH studies of abnormal X chromosomes in a patient with ANLL.

Cancer genetics and cytogenetics·1992

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Renal Capsule Xenografting and Subcutaneous Pellet Implantation for the Evaluation of Prostate Carcinogenesis and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
08:38

Renal Capsule Xenografting and Subcutaneous Pellet Implantation for the Evaluation of Prostate Carcinogenesis and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Published on: August 28, 2013

Androgen binding in the baboon prostate.

J P Karr, R Y Kirdani, G P Murphy

    Archives of Andrology
    |March 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Researchers identified and measured androgen receptors within the prostate glands of baboons. By using specific chemical competitors to isolate the receptors from other proteins, they determined how strongly these receptors bind to male hormones in different parts of the prostate. The study provides quantitative data on receptor density and binding strength in both the cranial and caudal lobes of the gland.

    Keywords:
    Steroid hormone bindingPrimate urologyCytosol protein analysisHormone receptor density

    Frequently Asked Questions

    More Related Videos

    Murine Prostate Micro-dissection and Surgical Castration
    08:49

    Murine Prostate Micro-dissection and Surgical Castration

    Published on: May 11, 2016

    A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
    07:25

    A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

    Published on: March 6, 2018

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 29, 2026

    Renal Capsule Xenografting and Subcutaneous Pellet Implantation for the Evaluation of Prostate Carcinogenesis and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    08:38

    Renal Capsule Xenografting and Subcutaneous Pellet Implantation for the Evaluation of Prostate Carcinogenesis and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

    Published on: August 28, 2013

    Murine Prostate Micro-dissection and Surgical Castration
    08:49

    Murine Prostate Micro-dissection and Surgical Castration

    Published on: May 11, 2016

    A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
    07:25

    A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

    Published on: March 6, 2018

    Area of Science:

    • Endocrinology and reproductive physiology
    • Androgen receptors in primate urology

    Background:

    Limited information exists regarding the specific molecular characteristics of hormone receptors within non-human primate prostate tissues. Prior research has often relied on rodent models, which may not fully reflect human prostatic physiology. That uncertainty drove investigators to examine the biochemical properties of these proteins in baboon models. No prior work had resolved whether receptor density varies significantly between distinct prostatic anatomical regions. This gap motivated a detailed biochemical assessment of cytosolic fractions. It was already known that testosterone-binding globulin can interfere with accurate receptor quantification in serum-contaminated samples. Researchers needed a reliable method to distinguish true receptor binding from non-specific interactions. Establishing these baseline parameters is necessary for understanding how prostatic tissue responds to hormonal signals.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The aim of this study was to identify and characterize androgen receptors within the prostatic lobes of the baboon. Researchers sought to determine if these receptors exhibit consistent binding properties across different anatomical regions of the gland. They addressed the challenge of distinguishing specific receptor binding from non-specific serum protein interactions. The investigation was motivated by the need to establish baseline biochemical data for primate prostate tissue. By quantifying binding sites and dissociation constants, the team aimed to clarify the hormonal sensitivity of the organ. This work addresses the lack of detailed molecular information regarding primate prostatic physiology. The researchers intended to provide a clear comparison between the caudal and cranial lobes. Their goal was to validate the use of specific competitors to isolate receptor activity in cytosolic preparations.

    Main Methods:

    The review approach involved analyzing cytosolic preparations derived from the caudal and cranial lobes of a castrated baboon. Investigators employed multiple-point saturation analyses to quantify the binding characteristics of the target proteins. They utilized charcoal adsorption to effectively eliminate free steroids from the samples. To ensure specificity, the team introduced cyproterone acetate as a competitor for testosterone-binding globulin. This strategy allowed for the accurate differentiation of high-affinity binding from potential serum contaminants. They also tested diethylstilbestrol to confirm that the receptor protein did not interact with synthetic estrogens. The team calculated the dissociation constant and the total number of binding sites per milligram of protein. This systematic protocol provided a robust framework for evaluating hormone-receptor interactions in primate tissue.

    Main Results:

    Key findings from the literature indicate that the caudal lobe possesses 102 fmoles/mg of cytosol protein in high-affinity binding sites. In contrast, the cranial lobe contains 49 fmoles/mg of protein. The dissociation constant for the caudal lobe was determined to be 4.0 X 10(-9) M. The cranial lobe exhibited a dissociation constant of 1.3 X 10(-9) M. These results demonstrate that both regions contain functional androgen receptors with distinct quantitative profiles. The researchers observed that diethylstilbestrol failed to displace the bound hormone, confirming the specificity of the receptor interaction. The data show that cyproterone acetate successfully minimized interference from testosterone-binding globulin during the assays. These measurements establish clear biochemical differences between the two anatomical prostatic regions in the baboon.

    Conclusions:

    The researchers successfully identified and characterized androgen receptors within the cytosolic fractions of both prostatic lobes. Synthesis and implications suggest that the caudal lobe contains a higher density of high-affinity binding sites compared to the cranial region. The dissociation constant values indicate that these receptors maintain strong binding capabilities across both anatomical sections. The study confirms that cyproterone acetate serves as an effective tool for isolating specific androgen interactions. These findings imply that regional differences in hormone sensitivity may influence prostatic function in primates. The data provide a quantitative foundation for future investigations into androgen-mediated signaling pathways. Researchers emphasize that the observed binding characteristics align with established expectations for high-affinity steroid receptors. This work clarifies the biochemical profile of prostatic androgen receptors in a relevant primate model.

    The researchers propose that androgen receptors function by binding dihydrotestosterone with high affinity. They utilized charcoal adsorption to remove free steroids, allowing for the precise calculation of binding site numbers and dissociation constants in the cytosolic fractions.

    Cyproterone acetate acts as a competitor for testosterone-binding globulin. Unlike other substances, it exhibits negligible binding to this globulin, making it useful for distinguishing specific receptor interactions from serum contaminants during saturation analysis.

    Charcoal adsorption is necessary to separate free steroids from receptor-bound complexes. This step ensures that only the high-affinity binding to the receptor protein is measured, preventing interference from unbound hormones or low-affinity serum proteins.

    Tritiated dihydrotestosterone serves as the primary ligand for identifying receptor sites. Its binding is measured against competitors to confirm specificity, ensuring that the detected signals represent true androgen receptor activity rather than non-specific protein interactions.

    The researchers measured the dissociation constant and the total number of binding sites. The caudal lobe showed 102 fmoles/mg of protein, whereas the cranial lobe contained 49 fmoles/mg, demonstrating a clear quantitative difference in receptor density.

    The authors propose that regional variations in hormone sensitivity exist within the prostate. They suggest that these differences in receptor density and binding affinity may contribute to the distinct physiological roles of the cranial and caudal prostatic lobes.