Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Similarity indices for spatial ecological data.

R M Fewster1, S T Buckland

  • 1School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St. Andrews, Mathematical Institute, Fife, UK. r.fewster@auckland.ac.nz

Biometrics
|June 21, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The relative contribution of remobilization and root uptake in supplying nitrogen after defoliation for regrowth of laminae in four grass species.

The New phytologist·2021
Same author

Fast likelihood-based inference for latent count models using the saddlepoint approximation.

Biometrics·2019
Same author

Visualizations for genetic assignment analyses using the saddlepoint approximation method.

Biometrics·2017
Same author

First Direct Evidence for Natal Wintering Ground Fidelity and Estimate of Juvenile Survival in the New Zealand Southern Right Whale Eubalaena australis.

PloS one·2016
Same author

Maximum likelihood estimation for model Mt,α for capture-recapture data with misidentification.

Biometrics·2014
Same author

Accounting for female reproductive cycles in a superpopulation capture-recapture framework.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2013
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian phase I/II platform design with data augmentation accounting for delayed outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new method for comparing species distribution maps, focusing on overall patterns rather than small local differences. This approach improves visual assessment and aids in selecting ecological models.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Spatial analysis
  • Biodiversity informatics

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of species distribution patterns is crucial for ecological modeling and conservation.
  • Traditional similarity indices often overemphasize local variations, potentially obscuring broader spatial relationships.
  • Developing robust methods to compare species distribution maps is essential for ecological research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel method for assessing similarity between species distribution maps.
  • To develop similarity measures that prioritize global spatial features over local discrepancies.
  • To demonstrate the utility of these new indices for ecological model selection.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed method groups sites into cliques to allow controlled adjustments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • This technique minimizes the impact of minor local dissimilarities on the overall similarity measure.
  • The method generates similarity indices that are visually more interpretable than traditional ones.

    • Main Results:

    • The new similarity indices provide visually more satisfactory comparisons of species distribution maps.
    • The method effectively reduces the influence of local discrepancies, highlighting global patterns.
    • The indices proved useful in comparing observed spatial patterns with model predictions.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed method offers a more robust way to assess similarity between species distribution maps.
    • This approach enhances the visual assessment of spatial patterns and aids in model selection.
    • The technique is applicable to various species, including oribatid mites, woodlarks, and red deer.