Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2026

Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
The Great Debate: Aggressive vs. Conservative Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Elderly Patients
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Insights
This study explores aggressive cardiac treatment decisions for acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients. It highlights the ethical dilemma of resource allocation between younger and older patients with identical conditions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Limited resources necessitate difficult treatment decisions in acute myocardial infarction (MI).
- Evidence-based justification is crucial for cardiac procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the ethical considerations in prioritizing aggressive cardiac intervention for acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients.
- To examine the impact of patient age on treatment decisions when resources are scarce.
Main Methods:
- Hypothetical case study involving two acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients with differing ages.
- Discussion of resource limitations (one coronary angiogram, balloon catheter, stent per day).
Main Results:
- Presents a dilemma with no definitive immediate resolution.
- Highlights the conflict between age and aggressive treatment protocols.
Conclusions:
- The scenario underscores the complex ethical challenges in cardiac care rationing.
- Age as a sole factor in aggressive treatment decisions requires careful ethical deliberation.
Abstract:
You wake up in a cold sweat. You dreamt that the country in which you practice rations aggressive care and insists on an evidence based justification for each cardiac procedure. You are allowed only one coronary angiogram each day, one balloon catheter, one stent. You have 2 patients, each admitted that day with acute myocardial infarction (MI). They are identical, except for their age; one is 42 years old, the other is 84. For the last several hours, you have tossed and turned, embroiled in a great debate. Which one should be treated aggressively? (c)1999 by CVRR, Inc.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Angina IV: Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management

