Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for priority setting among clinical preventive services.

M V Maciosek1, A B Coffield, J M McGinnis

  • 1HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
|June 22, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patterns of adaptation to children's food allergies.

Allergy·2015
Same author

Introduction.

Journal of lesbian studies·2014
Same author

Vitamin D deficiency associated with number of neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1.

Journal of medical genetics·2006
Same author

Laser microdissection and microarray analysis of breast tumors reveal ER-alpha related genes and pathways.

Oncogene·2005
Same author

[Intraoperative histological sections in obstetric brachial plexus lesions--comparison of macroscopic appearance, HE staining and toluidine blue staining].

Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V...·2003
Same author

Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: an advisory statement by the advanced life support task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

Circulation·2003
Same journal

"The Real Cost" Campaign: Efficacy by Design.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

A Model for 21st Century Public Health Education: FDA's "The Real Cost" Youth Tobacco Prevention Campaigns.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Fathers' adverse childhood experiences and children's behavior problems.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Darknet cryptomarket listings for abortion medications after Dobbs.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Modeling the Impact of Combined Individual and Population-level National strategies for preventing type 2 diabetes.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same journal

Caregiving burden and health disparities: A nationwide study of 2,180 parents caring for children with developmental disabilities in South Korea.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study details methods for comparing clinical preventive services using clinically preventable burden and cost-effectiveness. It addresses challenges and solutions for valuing these essential health interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Clinical preventive services are crucial for public health.
  • Evaluating the value of these services is complex.
  • Existing methods may not adequately compare diverse interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe methods for comparing clinical preventive services.
  • To establish criteria for assessing service value: clinically preventable burden (CPB) and cost-effectiveness (CE).
  • To address challenges and propose solutions for valid comparisons.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and applied methods to measure CPB and CE for U.S. Preventive Services Task Force-recommended services.
  • Focused on data requirements for valid comparative assessments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Considered a comprehensive range of data types.

    • Main Results:

    • Established a framework for comparing the relative value of clinical preventive services.
    • Identified key data needs and methodological considerations for CPB and CE analysis.
    • Addressed practical challenges in implementing these comparative methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The described methods enable robust comparisons of clinical preventive services.
    • Accurate measurement of CPB and CE is essential for informed decision-making.
    • This work supports evidence-based prioritization of preventive interventions.