Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
Published on: November 10, 2010
Illusory conjunctions die hard: a reply to Prinzmetal, Diedrichsen, and Ivry (2001)
1Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. w.donk@psy.vu.nl
Abstract:
M. Donk (1999) showed that various data patterns that have been considered as evidence for the existence of illusory conjunctions may be due to errors of target-nontarget confusion, an account that challenges the mere existence of illusory conjunction. In a reply, W. Prinzmetal, J. Diedrichsen, and R. B. Ivry (2001) argued against this conclusion, claiming that some earlier findings can be explained only when one assumes that illusory conjunctions exist. The current article shows that Prinzmetal et al.'s claims cannot refute any of Donk's earlier conclusions, suggesting indeed that one can only conclude that "illusory conjunctions are an illusion."
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
Reason and Intuition
The Availability Heuristic
Perceptual Constancy
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Counterfactual Thinking
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

