Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Friendly IVF: patient opinions.

A Højgaard1, H J Ingerslev, J Dinesen

  • 1Fertility Clinic and Perinatal Epidemiological Research Unit, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Sygehus, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark. astrid.hoejgaard@dadlnet.dk

Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|June 27, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Idiopathic early ovarian ageing: risk of miscarriage and chance of delivery following ART in a nationwide cohort study.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2022
Same author

Early ovarian ageing may be an early and useful marker of later health issues.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2020
Same author

Early ovarian ageing: is a low number of oocytes harvested in young women associated with an earlier and increased risk of age-related diseases?

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2020
Same author

Low-to-moderate alcohol consumption and success in fertility treatment: a Danish cohort study.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2019
Same author

Elective embryo transfers on Day 6 reduce implantation compared with transfers on Day 5.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2017
Same author

Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2015

Patients undergoing low stimulation IVF (LS-IVF) reported less stress and preferred simpler protocols compared to standard IVF (S-IVF). Despite higher cancellation risks, LS-IVF offers a more acceptable treatment experience for many.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • In Vitro Fertilization
  • Patient-Centered Care

Background:

  • Growing interest in low stimulation protocols for IVF necessitates understanding patient perspectives.
  • Evaluating patient attitudes towards different IVF stimulation regimens is crucial for optimizing treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare patient attitudes and experiences between low stimulation IVF (LS-IVF) and standard stimulation IVF (S-IVF).
  • To assess patient preferences regarding side-effects, stress, and overall treatment satisfaction in different IVF protocols.

Main Methods:

  • A questionnaire was administered to 167 patients on LS-IVF (unstimulated or clomiphene) and 116 patients on S-IVF (GnRH analogue/gonadotropin protocols).
  • The study analyzed patient-reported outcomes concerning treatment side-effects, stress levels, and future treatment preferences.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Patients on LS-IVF experienced significantly less stress from cycle cancellations compared to S-IVF patients.
  • A higher proportion of LS-IVF patients (93%) would recommend LS-IVF or a combined approach for future treatment compared to S-IVF patients (53%).
  • LS-IVF patients showed a greater acceptance of multiple treatment cycles.

Conclusions:

  • Patients generally prefer the simplicity and shorter duration of LS-IVF regimens.
  • Despite potential drawbacks like higher cancellation rates, the perceived benefits of LS-IVF outweigh those of S-IVF for many patients.
  • LS-IVF offers a more patient-preferred approach to assisted reproductive technology.