Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Murine Appendectomy Model of Chronic Colitis Associated Colorectal Cancer by Precise Localization of Caecal Patch
Published on: August 24, 2019
Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children
K E Applegate1, C J Sivit, A E Salvator
1Department of Radiology, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital of the University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106-5056, USA. applegate@uhrad.com
Purpose:
To compare negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children who underwent ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), or no imaging before urgent appendectomy.
Materials And Methods:
All children who underwent urgent appendectomy during a 4(1/2)-year period were identified in a surgical billing database. Pathology reports were coded as negative or as showing acute inflammation or perforation. Imaging up to 14 days before appendectomy or abscess drainage was noted, and imaging-based diagnoses were compared with pathologic findings. Patient age and sex were recorded.
Results:
Two hundred ninety-nine children, 176 (59%) male and 123 (41%) female (mean age, 10.4 years; age range, 1--21 years), underwent urgent appendectomy. One hundred twenty-six (42%) underwent no imaging, 121 (41%) underwent US with or without CT, and 52 (17%) underwent CT only; 44 (15%) underwent both US and CT. There were significantly higher rates of appendectomy with normal pathologic findings ("negative appendectomy") in patients who underwent no imaging (14% [18 of 126]) or US (17% [20 of 121]) versus the rates in those who underwent CT only (2% [one of 52]) (P =.02 and P =.007, respectively). The negative appendectomy rate was 7% in 96 patients who underwent CT with or without prior US. The perforation rates were not significantly different.
Conclusion:
As compared with children who underwent no preoperative imaging and those who underwent US, children who underwent CT had a significantly lower negative appendectomy rate, without a significantly higher perforation rate.
More Related Videos
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
04:08Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Longitudinal Incision for Endoscopic Submucosal Excavation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions
Published on: April 28, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Appendicitis