Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
Published on: January 5, 2024
Using outcome evaluations to assess interdisciplinary acute and chronic pain programs.
H D Hadjistavropoulos1, J Clark
1Clinical Research and Development Program, Regina Health District, 2180 23rd Avenue, Regina, SK, Canada S4S 0A5. hhadjistavropoulos@reginahealth.sk.ca
Outcome evaluations for chronic pain and acute injury management programs showed significant improvements in patient outcomes and satisfaction. These findings validate the effectiveness of interdisciplinary treatment approaches.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Outcome evaluations are crucial for validating treatment efficacy and building confidence among patients and healthcare providers.
- Two initiatives in the Regina Health District (RHD), Saskatchewan, Canada, were evaluated: the Chronic Pain Team Evaluation and Management (CP TEAM) Service and the Acute Injury Management (AIM) Program.
- These evaluations aimed to assess the effectiveness of these programs in improving patient outcomes and satisfaction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the CP TEAM Service for chronic pain patients.
- To assess the impact of the AIM Program on employees with acute musculoskeletal injuries.
- To determine patient and employee satisfaction with the implemented treatment programs.
Main Methods:
- Study 1 (CP TEAM): Compared 36 treated chronic pain patients with 11 untreated controls using follow-up questionnaires.
- Study 2 (AIM): Compared 20 treated employees with 15 control employees, assessing pain, interference, and job function.
- Data collection was integrated into routine treatment protocols to capture essential patient outcome information.
Main Results:
- CP TEAM participants reported decreased pain and interference in activities, with high overall satisfaction.
- AIM participants showed greater improvement in pain severity and interference compared to controls, alongside improved job function.
- Both programs demonstrated positive outcomes, with participants reporting high satisfaction with the services received.
Conclusions:
- Program evaluations serve as vital tools for assessing outcomes, validating services, and guiding future development.
- Integrating data collection into routine care enhances the efficiency of outcome assessment.
- The findings support the value of individualized, interdisciplinary approaches in managing chronic pain and acute injuries.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Analgesia and Pain Management
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...

