Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.

G F Woodman1, E K Vogel, S J Luck

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242-1407, USA. geoff-woodman@uiowa.edu

Psychological Science
|July 5, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Atypical attentional filtering of visual information in youth with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome as indexed by event-related potentials.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2021
Same author

The reliability and stability of visual working memory capacity.

Behavior research methods·2017
Same author

Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Attention-related modulation of sensory-evoked brain activity in a visual search task.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Monitoring the visual world: hemispheric asymmetries and subcortical processes in attention.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Are the same attentional mechanisms used to detect visual search targets defined by color, orientation, and motion?

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Visual search tasks require minimal visual working memory resources. Adding memory load only delayed reaction times, without affecting the search process itself, challenging attention-working memory theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Theories of attention often posit a significant role for visual working memory in visual search.
  • Understanding the interplay between attention and working memory is crucial for cognitive models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the extent to which visual working memory is involved in visual search.
  • To test the hypothesis that visual working memory resources are heavily utilized during visual search.

Main Methods:

  • A dual-task paradigm was employed, combining a visual search task with varying loads on visual working memory (0, 2, or 4 objects).
  • Reaction times for visual search were measured under different visual working memory conditions.
  • The impact of memory load on search efficiency (slope of reaction time vs. array size) was analyzed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A constant delay was observed in visual search reaction times when visual working memory was engaged, regardless of the memory load.
  • The slope of the reaction time function did not change with memory load, indicating the search process itself was unaffected.
  • Visual search tasks did not significantly impair the ability to maintain information in visual working memory.

Conclusions:

  • Visual search appears to demand minimal resources from visual working memory.
  • The findings challenge theories that propose a strong, interdependent relationship between attention and working memory in visual search.