Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The sievert: an enigmatic unit.

P Galle1

  • 1Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Santa-Cruz and CNPq, Ilheus, Ba, Brazil. pgalle@uesc.br

Cellular and Molecular Biology (Noisy-Le-Grand, France)
|July 10, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 24th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2022.

ESMO open·2023
Same author

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie·2022
Same author

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie·2022
Same author

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie·2022
Same author

[Visceral medicine: a partnership for the patient's benefit].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2014
Same author

[S3-guideline exocrine pancreatic cancer].

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie·2013
Same journal

Differential effects of high-sucrose and high-fat diets on metabolic syndrome, BBB integrity, and hippocampal Aβ accumulation.

Cellular and molecular biology (Noisy-le-Grand, France)·2026
Same journal

CRISPR systems in cancer therapeutics and diagnostics.

Cellular and molecular biology (Noisy-le-Grand, France)·2026
Same journal

Sex-specific effects of fluoxetine on REM sleep deprivation-induced behavioral impairments and BDNF downregulation in rats.

Cellular and molecular biology (Noisy-le-Grand, France)·2026
Same journal

Gene polymorphism and serum level of RANKL among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cellular and molecular biology (Noisy-le-Grand, France)·2026
Same journal

Effect of peniocerol on human meniscal fibrochondrocyte inflammation induced by IL-1β and TNF-α through the NF-κB signaling pathway.

Cellular and molecular biology (Noisy-le-Grand, France)·2026
Same journal

Integrated density functional theory, molecular docking, and pharmacokinetic modeling of mukonal and its derivatives as inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum TFIIH complex (Tfb5 subunit).

Cellular and molecular biology (Noisy-le-Grand, France)·2026
See all related articles

The effective dose (sievert) is often misunderstood. While intended for radiation protection, its use for predicting cancer and hereditary disease risks is hazardous, leading to significant prediction errors.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation protection
  • Radiobiology
  • Risk assessment

Background:

  • The concept of effective dose, measured in sieverts, is crucial for radiation protection.
  • It was proposed for quantitative risk assessment of radiation-induced diseases.
  • However, its application faces significant challenges and misunderstandings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the concept of effective dose and its unit, the sievert.
  • To evaluate the suitability of the sievert for predicting risks of radio-induced diseases.
  • To highlight historical prediction errors in radiation risk assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the effective dose and sievert.
  • Review of historical data and case studies, including the Chernobyl accident.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of predicted versus observed health outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • The sievert is frequently misunderstood and its application for risk prediction is hazardous.
    • Observed errors include underestimation of thyroid cancer post-Chernobyl and overestimation of other cancers and hereditary diseases.
    • The concept's limitations in accurately quantifying diverse radiation-induced health risks are evident.

    Conclusions:

    • The effective dose (sievert) is not a reliable universal measure for predicting all radiation-induced disease risks.
    • Historical data demonstrates significant inaccuracies in using the sievert for quantitative risk assessment.
    • Further refinement or alternative methods are needed for precise radiation risk evaluation.