Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Abdominal and total adiposity and risk of coronary heart disease in men
K M Rexrode1, J E Buring, J E Manson
1Division of Preventive Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. krexrode@partners.org
Insights
Waist circumference and waist-hip ratio predict coronary heart disease (CHD) in men. However, these measures of abdominal adiposity are not independent predictors of CHD risk when body mass index (BMI) is considered.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Abdominal adiposity is linked to coronary heart disease (CHD).
- Waist circumference is a simpler measure of abdominal adiposity than waist-hip ratio (WHR).
- The independence of abdominal adiposity measures from body mass index (BMI) as CHD predictors in men is uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare waist circumference and WHR as predictors of CHD in men.
- To determine if the association between abdominal adiposity and CHD is independent of BMI.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study of 16,164 US male physicians (aged 40-84).
- Anthropometric measurements (waist circumference, WHR, BMI) collected at baseline and follow-up.
- Coronary heart disease (CHD) events (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization) tracked over an average of 3.9 years.
Main Results:
- Higher waist circumference and WHR were associated with increased CHD risk.
- After adjusting for BMI, the association between abdominal adiposity measures and CHD risk was substantially attenuated.
- Higher BMI was a significant independent predictor of CHD risk.
Conclusions:
- Both waist circumference and WHR show a modest relationship with CHD risk in middle-aged and older men.
- Abdominal adiposity, measured by waist circumference or WHR, is not an independent predictor of CHD after accounting for BMI.
- BMI is a more robust predictor of CHD risk than abdominal adiposity measures alone.
Background:
Waist circumference is a simpler measure of abdominal adiposity than waist/hip ratio (WHR), but few studies have directly compared the two measures as predictors of coronary heart disease (CHD) in men. In addition, whether the association of abdominal adiposity is independent of total adiposity as measured by body mass index (BMI) in men remains uncertain.
Objective:
To compare waist circumference and WHR as predictors of CHD in men, and to determine whether the association is independent of BMI.
Design:
Prospective cohort study.
Methods:
We compared WHR, waist circumference and BMI with risk of CHD (myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization) among men in the Physicians' Health Study, a randomized trial of aspirin and beta-carotene among 22 071 apparently healthy US male physicians, aged 40-84 y at baseline in 1982. Men reported height at baseline, and weight, waist and hip measurements on the 9 y follow-up questionnaire.
Results:
Among the 16 164 men who reported anthropometric measurements and were free from prior CHD, stroke or cancer, a total of 552 subsequent CHD events occurred during an average follow-up of 3.9 y. After adjusting for age, randomized study agent, smoking, physical activity, parental history of myocardial infarction, alcohol intake, multivitamin and aspirin use, men in the highest WHR quintile (>or=0.99) had a relative risk (RR) for CHD of 1.50 (95% CI 1.14-1.98) compared with those in the lowest quintile (<0.90). Men in the highest waist circumference quintile (>or=103.6 cm) had a RR of 1.60 (CI, 1.21-2.11) for CHD compared with men in the lowest quintile (<88.4 cm). Further adjustment for BMI substantially attenuated these associations: men in the highest WHR and waist circumference quintiles had relative risks for CHD of 1.23 (CI, 0.92-1.66) and 1.06 (CI, 0.74-1.53), respectively. Men in the highest BMI quintile (>or=27.6 kg/m(2)) had a multivariate RR of CHD of 1.73 (CI, 1.29-2.32), after adjustment for WHR. No significant effect modification by age of the relationship between either measure of abdominal adiposity and risk of CHD was observed.
Conclusions:
These data support a modest relationship between abdominal adiposity, as measured by either WHR or waist circumference, and risk of CHD both in middle-aged and older men. However, abdominal adiposity did not remain an independent predictor of CHD after adjustment for BMI.
Related Concept Videos
Hypodermis
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Obesity
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Atherosclerosis III: Management

