Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Productive inventory and case/agreement contingencies: a methodological note on Rispoli (1999).

C T Schütze1

  • 1Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Box 951543, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1543, USA. cschutze@ucla.edu

Journal of Child Language
|July 14, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study challenges findings on English language acquisition, arguing that previous methodologies overlook children's pronoun usage. Methodological improvements are crucial for understanding syntactic versus morphological errors in child language development.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Different rates of pronoun case error: comments on Rispoli (1998)

Journal of child language·1999
Same author

Explaining patterns of pronoun case error: response to Rispoli.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·1999
Same author

The relationship between the frequency and the processing complexity of linguistic structure.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·1996
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Child Language Acquisition
  • Developmental Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Previous research suggested a link between pronoun case and verb agreement in child English acquisition.
  • Methodological issues in prior studies, including Rispoli (1999), have been identified.
  • The AGR/Tense Omission Model provides a framework for analyzing these developmental patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critique the methodology used in studies examining pronoun case and verb agreement in child English.
  • To demonstrate how methodological flaws can obscure the relationship between syntactic and morphological development.
  • To re-evaluate findings within the AGR/Tense Omission Model by addressing these methodological concerns.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of children's productive lexical inventory of pronoun forms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critique of methodological biases in previous studies (e.g., Rispoli, 1999).
  • Distinguishing between syntactic and morphological sources of error in language acquisition.

    • Main Results:

    • The methodology employed by Rispoli (1999) is shown to bias results against detecting predicted contingencies.
    • Failure to account for children's lexical pronoun knowledge prevents distinguishing syntactic from morphological errors.
    • The study highlights the importance of accurate methodological approaches for understanding language development.

    Conclusions:

    • Methodological refinements are essential for accurately assessing the relationship between pronoun case and verb agreement in child language.
    • The distinction between syntactic and morphological errors is critical for models of language acquisition, such as the AGR/Tense Omission Model.
    • Revisiting existing data with improved methods may yield different conclusions about English language acquisition patterns.