Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
[Pelvic and acetabular fractures, long term results, retrospective study from Cadolles from 1977 to 1997]
C A Déruaz1, P Tschantz, Y Groebli
1Hôpital des Cadolles, Hôpitaux de la Ville de Neuchâtel, Service de chirurgie.
Insights
This study analyzed outcomes for 35 patients with unstable pelvic and acetabular fractures treated surgically. Results showed outcomes comparable to existing literature, considering pain, function, and clinical findings.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Trauma Care
Background:
- Unstable pelvic and acetabular fractures are complex injuries.
- Long-term outcomes require thorough evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the long-term outcomes of surgically treated unstable pelvic and acetabular fractures.
- To compare results with existing literature and discuss evaluation scores.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 51 surgically treated cases from 1977-1997.
- Follow-up on 35 patients with a mean of six years post-operation.
- Evaluation of pain, neurological, genito-urinary issues, gait, social life, and clinical findings.
Main Results:
- Surgical treatment outcomes were comparable to other reported series.
- Analysis included various factors influencing patient recovery.
- Different scoring systems for outcome evaluation were discussed.
Conclusions:
- Surgical management of these fractures yields results consistent with current literature.
- Comprehensive assessment is crucial for understanding patient recovery.
- Standardized evaluation scores aid in comparing treatment outcomes.
Abstract:
From 1977 to 1997, 51 unstable pelvic and/or acetabular fractures were operated in our institution. We could control 35 after a mean postoperative period of nearly six years. The outcome was analysed considering several factors: pain, neurological and genito-urinary problems, gait, social life, Xrays and clinical findings. Our results match well with those of other series. Different evaluation scores used in the literature are compared and discussed.
