Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Location constancy and its effect on visual selection.

P Goolkasian1, A Bojko

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte 28223-0001, USA. pagoolka@email.uncc.edu

Spatial Vision
|July 14, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Web site in cognitive science.

Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc·2001
Same author

The spectrum of neuropsychiatric abnormalities associated with electrical status epilepticus in sleep.

Brain & development·2000
Same author

Retinal location and its effect on the spatial distribution of visual attention.

The American journal of psychology·2000
Same author

Pictures, words, and sounds: from which format are we best able to reason?

The Journal of general psychology·2000
Same author

Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity.

Spine·1999
Same author

A randomized, double-blind, prospective pilot study of botulinum toxin injection for refractory, unilateral, cervicothoracic, paraspinal, myofascial pain syndrome.

Spine·1998
Same journal

Comment on 'angle illusion on a picture's surface' by Hammad et al. (2008).

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial distance between target and irrelevant patch modulates detection in a texture segmentation task.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Inhibition related impairments of coherent motion perception in the attention-induced motion blindness paradigm.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial-temporal modeling of interactive image interpretation.

Spatial vision·2009
See all related articles

Location constancy significantly impacts selective attention. Consistent target locations enhance attention more than peripheral vs. foveal positioning, affecting distractor effects and target/distractor distance.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • Selective attention is crucial for processing visual information.
  • Understanding how attention shifts and is maintained is key to cognitive function.
  • Location constancy, the predictability of a target's position, is a potential factor influencing attentional allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of location constancy on selective attention to cued locations.
  • To compare the effectiveness of target/distractor distance and target/distractor compatibility under varying location constancy conditions.
  • To examine these effects under both covert (unseen eye movements) and overt (visible eye movements) attention.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Measured reaction time and error rates for targets at varied locations (0.62–20 degrees).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments 2 & 3: Assessed covert and overt attention with fixed target locations within trial blocks.
  • Utilized effect size calculations for current and past research (Goolkasian, 1999; Goolkasian & Tarantino, 1999).

    • Main Results:

    • Location constancy, not target location (foveal vs. peripheral), more strongly influences attentional patterns.
    • When target locations vary, distractor compatibility effects generally outweigh target/distractor distance effects.
    • When target locations are fixed, the relative importance of target/distractor distance and compatibility reverses.

    Conclusions:

    • Attentional allocation is highly sensitive to the consistency of target locations.
    • Predictable target locations modulate the interplay between distractor compatibility and spatial distance.
    • Findings highlight the significant role of location predictability in shaping selective visual attention.