Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Location constancy and its effect on visual selection.

P Goolkasian1, A Bojko

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte 28223-0001, USA. pagoolka@email.uncc.edu

Spatial Vision
|July 14, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Web site in cognitive science.

Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc·2001
Same author

The spectrum of neuropsychiatric abnormalities associated with electrical status epilepticus in sleep.

Brain & development·2000
Same author

Retinal location and its effect on the spatial distribution of visual attention.

The American journal of psychology·2000
Same author

Pictures, words, and sounds: from which format are we best able to reason?

The Journal of general psychology·2000
Same author

Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity.

Spine·1999
Same author

A randomized, double-blind, prospective pilot study of botulinum toxin injection for refractory, unilateral, cervicothoracic, paraspinal, myofascial pain syndrome.

Spine·1998
Same journal

Comment on 'angle illusion on a picture's surface' by Hammad et al. (2008).

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial distance between target and irrelevant patch modulates detection in a texture segmentation task.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Inhibition related impairments of coherent motion perception in the attention-induced motion blindness paradigm.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial-temporal modeling of interactive image interpretation.

Spatial vision·2009
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Location constancy significantly impacts selective attention. Consistent target locations enhance attention more than peripheral vs. foveal positioning, affecting distractor effects and target/distractor distance.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • Selective attention is crucial for processing visual information.
  • Understanding how attention shifts and is maintained is key to cognitive function.
  • Location constancy, the predictability of a target's position, is a potential factor influencing attentional allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of location constancy on selective attention to cued locations.
  • To compare the effectiveness of target/distractor distance and target/distractor compatibility under varying location constancy conditions.
  • To examine these effects under both covert (unseen eye movements) and overt (visible eye movements) attention.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Measured reaction time and error rates for targets at varied locations (0.62–20 degrees).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments 2 & 3: Assessed covert and overt attention with fixed target locations within trial blocks.
  • Utilized effect size calculations for current and past research (Goolkasian, 1999; Goolkasian & Tarantino, 1999).

    • Main Results:

    • Location constancy, not target location (foveal vs. peripheral), more strongly influences attentional patterns.
    • When target locations vary, distractor compatibility effects generally outweigh target/distractor distance effects.
    • When target locations are fixed, the relative importance of target/distractor distance and compatibility reverses.

    Conclusions:

    • Attentional allocation is highly sensitive to the consistency of target locations.
    • Predictable target locations modulate the interplay between distractor compatibility and spatial distance.
    • Findings highlight the significant role of location predictability in shaping selective visual attention.