Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implants in regenerated bone in a primate model.

M E Fritz1, M K Jeffcoat, M Reddy

  • 1Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Journal of Periodontology
|July 17, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inhibiting Anti-angiogenic VEGF165b Activates a Novel miR-17-20a-Calcipressin-3 Pathway that Revascularizes Ischemic Muscle in Peripheral Artery Disease.

Research square·2023
Same author

A third-line antiretroviral therapy register to track patient clinical and virological outcomes.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2022
Same author

A third-line antiretroviral therapy register to track patient clinical and virological outcomes.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2022
Same author

A multicenter prospective observational study on the use of type and screen method versus conventional type and crossmatch policy for pre-transfusion testing in the Indian population.

Immunohematology·2022
Same author

Positive direct antiglobulin tests in cancer patients hospitalized with COVID-19: A brief report from India.

Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine·2022
Same author

Loss of a globally unique kelp forest from Oman.

Scientific reports·2022
Same journal

Cardiovascular and anti-inflammatory effects of periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same journal

Impact of toothbrush type and periodontal phenotype on root coverage stability: A 6-year observational follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same journal

Local immunoinflammatory profiles following treatment in primary and permanent dentitions in molar-incisor pattern periodontitis: One-year follow-up.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same journal

An in vitro comparison of PDGF-BB release from composite graft materials containing leukocyte-rich platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-derived growth factor-BB and β-tricalcium phosphate.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same journal

Periodontal inflamed surface area (PISA) system and components: Potential for exploring the periodontal systemic interface.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same journal

Evaluating diagnostic precision in applying the 2017 periodontal disease framework: A Canadian study across training levels.

Journal of periodontology·2026
See all related articles

Dental implants can be successfully placed in bone regenerated using guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques. This study in primates shows regenerated bone supports implants as effectively as native bone, with similar bone-to-implant contact after loading.

Area of Science:

  • Oral surgery
  • Regenerative medicine
  • Dental implantology

Background:

  • Guided bone regeneration (GBR) was previously used to repair large mandibular bone defects in primates.
  • This study investigates implant placement and loading in GBR-treated bone.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term success of root-form implants placed in GBR-created regenerated bone.
  • To compare implant performance in regenerated bone versus native bone.

Main Methods:

  • Standardized mandibular defects (8 x 19 mm) were created in 9 primates.
  • Reinforced ePTFE membranes were used for GBR, with implants placed 12 months post-regeneration.
  • Implants were loaded with prostheses for 12 months and compared to implants in non-regenerated bone.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Implants in regenerated bone exhibited comparable radiological and histomorphometric characteristics to those in native bone.
  • Bone-to-implant contact percentages were similar: 65% in regenerated bone vs. 59% in non-regenerated bone.

Conclusions:

  • Root-form implants placed in GBR-regenerated primate bone demonstrate equivalent outcomes to implants in non-regenerated bone.
  • GBR is a viable method for bone augmentation to support dental implants.