Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are responses in avoidance procedures "safety" signals?

M N Branch1

  • 1Psychology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, USA. branch@psych.ufl.edu

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|July 17, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Dinsmoor's theory offers a parsimonious explanation for avoidance behavior using established principles. It aligns with positive reinforcement research and may explain varying conditioning rates for different responses.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the difficulty of studying "Basic" behavioral processes in humans.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Some things significance testing does and does not do.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Where have all the behaviorists gone?

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Praxics and behaviorism.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Tolerance to the effects of cocaine on performance under behavior-correlated reinforcement magnitude.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2001
Same author

A comparison of fixed and variable doses of cocaine in producing and augmenting tolerance to its effects on schedule-controlled behavior.

Behavioural pharmacology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Psychology
  • Learning Theory

Background:

  • Dinsmoor's (2001) theory explains avoidance behavior using established principles, avoiding the need for a separate shock-frequency reduction process.
  • This approach aligns with research on momentary contiguities in positive reinforcement.

Discussion:

  • The theory may account for differential conditioning rates observed across various response forms.
  • Further elaboration is needed on the temporal aspects of response-associated stimuli and the function of warning stimuli.

Key Insights:

  • Parsimony: Relies on well-established principles, offering a simpler explanation for avoidance.
  • Integration: Blends effectively with existing knowledge of positive reinforcement.
  • Explanatory Potential: May clarify why different response forms condition at different rates.

Related Experiment Videos

Outlook:

  • Future research should clarify the role and temporal characteristics of warning stimuli in avoidance learning.
  • Investigating the mechanisms for establishing "safety" is crucial for a comprehensive understanding.