Related Experiment Videos
Use of a template to improve documentation and coding.
E A Rose1, A M Deshikachar, K L Schwartz
1Department of Family Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48235, USA. erose@med.wayne.edu
Family Medicine
|July 18, 2001
Summary
Physician documentation improved with a new template for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis. However, this template did not reduce evaluation and management (E&M) coding errors.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Clinical Documentation Improvement
- Healthcare Quality
Background:
- Accurate evaluation and management (E&M) coding presents a significant challenge for physicians.
- Clinical guidelines integrated into patient visits may enhance E&M coding accuracy and appropriateness.
- A novel template, derived from a clinical prediction rule for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis, was developed to aid documentation and coding decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of a clinical prediction rule-based template on physician documentation and E&M coding for sore throat visits.
- To determine if enhanced documentation through templates improves the accuracy of coding and billing.
- To evaluate the effect of templates on treatment decisions for patients with suspected GABHS pharyngitis.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 100 office visits for sore throat.
- Fifty visits were documented using the developed template, while the other 50 used traditional progress notes.
- Analysis included counting documented history and physical examination items and comparing billed service levels to supported service levels.
Main Results:
- Templates significantly increased the recording of history of present illness and physical examination items compared to progress notes.
- The templates positively influenced treatment decisions for patients with a low probability of GABHS.
- No significant difference was observed in coding and billing errors between the template group and the progress note group.
Conclusions:
- The implemented template led to more comprehensive documentation of patient encounters.
- Despite improved documentation, the template did not demonstrate a reduction in coding or billing errors when compared to standard progress notes.