Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Meniscus refixation: suture or anchor?].

M Tingart1, J Höher, B Bouillon

  • 1Abteilung für Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum Köln-Merheim, II. Chirurgischer Lehrstuhl der Universität zu Köln, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, 51109 Köln.

Der Unfallchirurg
|July 20, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of the interhospital patient transfer after implementation of a regionalized trauma care system (TraumaNetzwerk DGU<sup>®</sup>) in Germany.

Frontiers in medicine·2023
Same author

Correction to: Hospitalization length, surgical duration, and blood lost among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta‑analysis.

Musculoskeletal surgery·2020
Same author

Nerve palsy, dislocation and revision rate among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Musculoskeletal surgery·2020
Same author

Minimally versus conventional-invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.

Musculoskeletal surgery·2020
Same author

Hospitalization length, surgical duration, and blood lost among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Musculoskeletal surgery·2020
Same author

[Analgesia for trauma patients in emergency medicine].

Der Anaesthesist·2020
Same journal

[3D printing in fracture treatment : Current practice and best practice consensus].

Der Unfallchirurg·2022
Same journal

[3D printing in trauma surgery : Germany lags far behind].

Der Unfallchirurg·2022
Same journal

[Subtrochanteric fractures].

Der Unfallchirurg·2022
Same journal

[3D printing in the field of shoulder surgery].

Der Unfallchirurg·2022
Same journal

[New assessment recommendations for disability in private accident insurance, part 1 : An interdisciplinary consented approach-Basics].

Der Unfallchirurg·2022
Same journal

[Amputation techniques].

Der Unfallchirurg·2022
See all related articles

Biodegradable meniscus arrows offer faster surgery and easier technique compared to sutures. However, experimental studies show lower strength, and clinical studies reveal comparable healing rates with potential complications, necessitating further research.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomaterials
  • Sports medicine

Background:

  • Suture techniques are standard for meniscus bucket-handle lesions.
  • Biodegradable meniscus implants, like arrows, were introduced in 1993 and are used clinically.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and discuss the existing literature on biodegradable meniscus implants.
  • To compare the efficacy and safety of meniscus arrows versus traditional suture techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Literature search of Medline (1966-2000) using keywords 'meniscal repair' and 'arrow'.
  • Analysis of ten retrieved publications focusing on experimental and clinical studies.

Main Results:

  • Meniscus arrows offer reduced operation time, easier technique, and lower neurovascular risk.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experimental studies indicate lower failure strength for arrows compared to sutures.
  • Clinical studies show comparable meniscal healing rates but report complications like inflammatory reactions and displacement.
  • Conclusions:

    • No definitive judgment on meniscus arrows is possible based on current literature.
    • Individual indications for lesion type and location are recommended.
    • Further prospective randomized studies are needed to evaluate combined techniques and long-term outcomes.