Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Boeing prospective study and beyond.

E Volinn1, K F Spratt, M Magnusson

  • 1The Medical Research Unit in Ringkjøbing County, Denmark. Epaulv@yahoo.com

Spine
|July 21, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of whole body vibration on spinal proprioception in healthy individuals.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2018
Same author

Height changes due to autotraction.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

In vivo measurement of intervertebral creep: a preliminary report.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Variations in the examination of the medial collateral ligament of the knee.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Comparative study of fracture gap motion in external fixation.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Effect of two sitting postures on lumbar sagittal alignment and intervertebral discs in runners.

La Radiologia medica·2011
Same journal

To the Editor "Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Statin Usage Are Associated With Rates of Pseudarthrosis Following Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion" by Lavu et al.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Sarcopenia Increases Adjacent Segment Degeneration Risk within 3 Years of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Two-Year Cervical Alignment Trajectories and Associated Radiographic Factors after Posterior Spinal Fusion for Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Association of C7 Laminoplasty and Decompression Construct Length With Postoperative Axial Symptoms After Cervical Expansive Unilateral Open-door Laminoplasty.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Functional Assessment of Dysphagia and Dysphonia Following C3-C4 Anterior Spine Surgery: A Prospective Comparison Between Simplified Retropharyngeal and Anterolateral Approaches.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Bone Growth Stimulation Improves Union Outcomes in Type II Odontoid Fractures: Insights from a Multicenter Propensity-Matched Pilot Study.

Spine·2026
See all related articles

This review critically examined the Boeing prospective study on occupational back pain reporting. Findings suggest limitations in the original study, highlighting the need for improved guidelines in industrial back pain research.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Musculoskeletal Disorders

Background:

  • Individual variability in reporting occupational back pain has been noted for over a century.
  • Field studies offer significant potential for understanding this variability.
  • The Boeing prospective study was a large-scale field investigation into this phenomenon.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the conclusions of the Boeing prospective study.
  • To develop guidelines for future field studies on industrial back pain.

Main Methods:

  • A critical review of the Boeing prospective study was conducted.
  • The review incorporated methodological and substantive literature published since the study's inception.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The Boeing prospective study, with a participation rate of 33-41%, explained only 7% of the variation in back pain reporting.
  • Potential biases that may have skewed the results toward the null were identified.

Conclusions:

  • Limitations identified in the Boeing study serve as a guide for future research on occupational back pain.
  • Proposed guidelines include: hypothesis-driven designs, subgroup delineation, inclusion of occupational and psychosocial factors, consideration of non-workplace factors, and careful abstract crafting.