Related Experiment Videos
The partial thromboplastin time in the CAP survey program.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|June 1, 1975
Summary
Variability in partial thromboplastin time (PTT) testing was high. Activated methods showed less variability than non-activated ones, suggesting they may be better for routine lab use.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Laboratory Medicine
- Hematology
Background:
- Proficiency testing is crucial for ensuring accurate laboratory measurements.
- Partial thromboplastin time (PTT) is a key diagnostic test in coagulation analysis.
- Previous studies highlighted the need for standardization in PTT testing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the variability of partial thromboplastin time (PTT) measurements.
- To compare the performance of activated versus non-activated PTT methods.
- To identify factors contributing to PTT measurement variability in clinical laboratories.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Surveys conducted between 1969 and 1973.
- Statistical comparison of interlaboratory variability for different PTT methodologies.
- Review of laboratory adherence to manufacturer guidelines for PTT assays.
Main Results:
- Significant variability in PTT determination was observed across participating laboratories.
- Non-activated PTT procedures exhibited greater interlaboratory variability compared to activated methods.
- Many laboratories failed to establish specific upper limits of normal for their PTT systems.
- Non-adherence to manufacturer instructions, particularly regarding incubation times and calcium concentrations, was common.
Conclusions:
- Activated PTT methods may be preferable for routine laboratory use due to lower variability.
- Establishing laboratory-specific upper limits of normal is essential for accurate PTT interpretation.
- Improved adherence to manufacturer protocols is necessary to reduce PTT measurement variability and enhance diagnostic accuracy.