Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

Voltammetry: Factors Affecting Measurements

Voltammetry: Factors Affecting Measurements

A current produced due to the redox reactions of the analyte at the working and auxiliary electrodes is called a faradaic current. The reaction can be divided into two types. The current generated due to the reduction of the analyte is called cathodic current, and it carries a positive charge. In contrast, the current produced by analyte oxidation is known as an anodic current, and it has a negative charge. The applied potential at the working electrode determines the faradaic current flow, and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

An explicit representation of the Luria-Delbrück distribution.

Journal of mathematical biology·2001

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Physiological Experimentation with the Crayfish Hindgut: A Student Laboratory Exercise

Physiological Experimentation with the Crayfish Hindgut: A Student Laboratory Exercise

Published on: January 19, 2011

A note on the evaluation of fluctuation experiments.

¹Institute for Cancer Research, Borschkegasse 8a, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. a8505892@unet.univie.ac.at

Mutation Research

|July 27, 2001

Summary

This study enhances fluctuation analysis for measuring mutation rates in single-cell populations. The improved method accounts for factors like residual mutation and phenotypic lag, offering a more comprehensive approach.

Area of Science:

Genetics
Microbiology
Evolutionary Biology

Background:

Fluctuation analysis is a key method for determining mutation rates in microbial populations.
Existing models may not fully capture complexities like residual mutation or phenotypic lag.

Purpose of the Study:

To extend the Luria-Delbrück distribution theory for more accurate mutation rate measurement.
To develop a unified method for evaluating fluctuation experiments with added biological complexities.
To assess the limitations and comparative value of the enhanced fluctuation analysis.

Main Methods:

Extension of the Lea and Coulson theory for the Luria-Delbrück distribution.
Incorporation of residual mutation, reduced plating efficiency, and phenotypic lag into the model.

More Related Videos

Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER

Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER

Published on: May 19, 2019

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Physiological Experimentation with the Crayfish Hindgut: A Student Laboratory Exercise

Physiological Experimentation with the Crayfish Hindgut: A Student Laboratory Exercise

Published on: January 19, 2011

Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER

Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER

Published on: May 19, 2019

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

Development of a unifying evaluation method for fluctuation experiments.

Main Results:

A refined theoretical framework for fluctuation analysis is established.
The method accounts for previously challenging experimental factors.
Demonstration that not all influencing factors can be simultaneously determined.

Conclusions:

The enhanced fluctuation analysis offers a more robust method for mutation rate measurement.
This approach retains or surpasses the value of alternative methods.
Numerical examples illustrate the practical application and validity of the extended theory.