Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Initial evaluation of quantitative performance of chromatographic methods using replicates at multiple

M A Castillo1, R C Castells

  • 1División de Química Analítica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina.

Journal of Chromatography. A
|July 27, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Accurate quantitative evaluation of new analytical methods is crucial. This study proposes a robust calibration approach using replicates to determine detection limits, outperforming unweighted least-squares regression for heteroscedastic data.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A new methodology to assess the performance of AOPs in complex samples: Application to the degradation of phenolic compounds by O<sub>3</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>/UV-A-Vis.

Chemosphere·2019
Same author

[A 45 year-old male with lumbar tumours].

Semergen·2013
Same author

Phosphorylation of DeltaFosB mediates its stability in vivo.

Neuroscience·2008
Same author

Behavior of n-alkanes on poly(oxyethylene) capillary columns. Evaluation of interfacial effects.

Journal of chromatography. A·2001
Same author

Gas chromatographic study of the hydrogen bonding of aliphatic alcohols to tri-n-octylphosphine oxide.

Journal of chromatography. A·2001
Same author

Insecticidal, anti-juvenile hormone, and fungicidal activities of organic extracts from different Penicillium species and their isolated active components.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·1999

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chromatography
  • Method Validation

Background:

  • Novel analytical methods require thorough quantitative evaluation for reliable application.
  • Many published chromatographic methods lack comprehensive quantitative assessment.
  • Standard validation protocols include key performance characteristics like detection limits and linear range.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a methodology for quantitative evaluation of analytical methods using calibration data with replicates.
  • To compare different regression techniques (unweighted vs. weighted least-squares) for analyzing calibration data, especially when heteroscedasticity is present.
  • To assess the impact of data heteroscedasticity on the estimation of detection and quantitation limits.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized calibration data with multiple replicates at each analyte level.
  • Employed weighted least-squares regression (WLSR) for heteroscedastic data and unweighted least-squares regression (ULSR) for homoscedastic data.
  • Calculated limits of detection (LODs) using both regression approaches and the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio method.
  • Applied the methodology to evaluate a method for determining nine biogenic amines via RPLC after dabsyl chloride derivatization.

    • Main Results:

    • WLSR and the S/N approach yielded comparable limits of detection for the biogenic amines.
    • ULSR significantly overestimated limits of detection (7-78 times higher) due to the heteroscedastic nature of the calibration data.
    • Replicates in calibration are essential for detecting changes in peak area standard deviation and ensuring accurate regression analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Weighted least-squares regression is essential for accurate quantitative evaluation of analytical methods exhibiting heteroscedasticity.
    • The proposed method provides reliable quantitative data, including detection limits, crucial for method validation and application.
    • Careful consideration of calibration data characteristics, like heteroscedasticity, is vital for robust analytical method development.