Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Experience with anatomic breast implants.

P C Hobar¹, K Gutowski

¹Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.

Clinics in Plastic Surgery

|July 27, 2001

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Anatomic implants offer valuable breast augmentation options for surgeons. They are particularly useful for patients with limited skin or underdeveloped lower breast areas.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Porous hydroxyapatite granules for alloplastic enhancement of the facial region.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2000

Same author

Total soft-tissue reconstruction of the middle and lower face with multiple simultaneous free flaps in a pediatric patient.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2000

Same author

Pericranial flap correction of superior sulcus depression in the anophthalmic orbit.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2000

Same author

An algorithm for abdominal wall reconstruction.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2000

Same author

Subperiosteal rejuvenation of the midface and periorbital area: a simplified approach.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1999

Same author

Surgical outcomes using bioabsorbable plating systems in pediatric craniofacial surgery.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·1998

Area of Science:

Plastic Surgery
Aesthetic Medicine

Background:

Breast augmentation is a common procedure.
Challenges include limited skin elasticity and lower pole deficiency.

Observation:

Anatomic implants present a viable surgical alternative.
These implants are suitable for specific patient anatomies.

Findings:

Anatomic implants address challenges in augmentation.
They are effective in cases of tight skin envelopes.
They are also beneficial for deficient lower breast poles.

Implications:

Anatomic implants expand surgical possibilities in breast augmentation.
They offer tailored solutions for complex cases.

Improved patient outcomes can be achieved with careful selection.