Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimum and comfortable driving headways: reality versus perception.

M Taieb-Maimon1, D Shinar

  • 1Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Human Factors
|July 28, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Under-reporting bicycle accidents to police in the COST TU1101 international survey: Cross-country comparisons and associated factors.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2017
Same author

Older people's driving habits, visual abilities, and subjective assessment of daily visual functioning.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2014
Same author

Central processing uncertainty as a determinant of choice reaction time.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Causes of near misses in critical care of neonates and children.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2008
Same author

Self-reports of safe driving behaviors in relationship to sex, age, education and income in the US adult driving population.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2001
Same author

Fleet study evaluation of an advance brake warning system.

Human factors·2001
Same journal

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Towards Safe and Comfortable Vehicle Control Transitions: A Systematic Review of Takeover Time, Time Budget, and Takeover Outcomes.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

Drivers often maintain unsafe time headways, regardless of speed. Their perception of distance and reaction times show no correlation, impacting driving safety and smart cruise control design.

Area of Science:

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Traffic Safety Research
  • Automotive Engineering

Background:

  • Understanding driver behavior in car-following situations is crucial for road safety.
  • Previous research indicates variability in driver-set headways, but real-world adjustments and perception accuracy require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate drivers' actual headways in car-following scenarios under different instructions.
  • To examine the relationship between drivers' brake reaction times and their maintained headways.
  • To assess the accuracy of drivers' perceived headway estimations using various metrics.

Main Methods:

  • A field study involving drivers instructed to maintain specific headways (minimum safe, comfortable normal) at speeds from 50-100 km/hr.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurement of actual distance and time headways, brake reaction times under high attention, and spoken headway estimates (meters, car lengths, seconds).

    • Main Results:

    • Drivers maintained constant time headways irrespective of speed, adjusting distance accordingly.
    • A significant number of drivers adopted unsafe time headways relative to their reaction times.
    • No significant correlation was found between minimal headways and brake reaction times.
    • Perceived headway accuracy varied, with meters and car lengths yielding more accurate estimates than seconds.

    Conclusions:

    • Driver headway adjustments may not inherently account for safety margins relative to reaction times.
    • Inaccurate headway perception, particularly when using time-based units, can compromise driving safety.
    • Findings inform driver education, headway perception models, and the design of intelligent vehicle systems like smart cruise control.