Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical audit: can we improve further?

E D Babu1, A Z Khan, A Khashaba

  • 1Cheltenham General Hospital. selvibabu@hotmail.com

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
|August 2, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study looked at how junior doctors understand and participate in clinical audit. It involved 146 trainees from nine hospitals. The results showed that 72.8% of trainees had performed audit, but nearly half of those faced challenges in collecting data. The authors suggest that trainees need more support to engage in audit activities. The study highlights the importance of data access and institutional backing. It does not claim that audit is the only way to improve healthcare quality. The findings suggest that better support could help trainees participate more effectively. The study does not propose new audit methods or policies. It focuses on understanding current trainee experiences and barriers.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trends of surgical-care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-centre study in India (IndSurg Collaboration).

Journal of postgraduate medicine·2023
Same author

Role of vanadium ions substitution on spinel MnCo<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> towards enhanced electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen generation.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Burden of oral precancer and cancer among an indigenous tribal population of South India - An evaluative study.

Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research·2023
Same author

Assessment of Knowledge, Awareness and Attitude towards Oral Precancer and Cancer among Narikuravar Population in Pondicherry State.

South Asian journal of cancer·2022
Same author

Superior Parietal Lobule: A Role in Relative Localization of Multiple Different Elements.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2020
Same author

Prognostic relevance of the posterior resection margin for predicting disease free survival in ampullary adenocarcinoma.

Surgical oncology·2020

Area of Science:

  • Medical education research
  • Healthcare quality improvement
  • Clinical governance

Background:

Healthcare professionals rely on clinical audit to assess their performance against set benchmarks. Prior research has shown that audit can drive improvements in patient care and service delivery. However, the extent to which trainees grasp the audit process remains unclear. No prior work had resolved how trainee engagement with audit is influenced by institutional support. That uncertainty drove this investigation into junior doctors' experiences. The study aimed to identify obstacles to audit participation. It also sought to clarify how training environments affect audit readiness. Existing knowledge lacked data on trainee perspectives in this context. This gap motivated the focus on trainee-reported audit challenges.

Purpose Of The Study:

The goal was to evaluate junior doctors' understanding and participation in audit activities. The researchers wanted to determine how often trainees engage in audit work. They also aimed to identify barriers to audit involvement. The survey targeted trainees across multiple hospitals to ensure broad representation. The study focused on trainees' self-reported experiences with audit. It aimed to highlight areas where support structures could be improved. The motivation stemmed from the need to enhance audit participation. The researchers proposed that better support could increase engagement.

Keywords:
healthcare quality improvementaudit participationtrainee supportclinical governance

Frequently Asked Questions

72.8% of 146 trainees reported performing audit activities.

48.6% of those who performed audit experienced difficulty in obtaining data.

Trainees reported challenges in accessing required data for audit.

The study suggests that support is important for encouraging trainee participation.

The study included trainees from nine hospitals.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The authors conducted a survey and questionnaire-based study across nine hospitals. They collected data from 146 trainees, including SpRs and SHOs. The survey focused on trainees' understanding and experience with audit. The study design allowed for both quantitative and qualitative insights. The researchers used structured questions to assess audit participation. They also asked about challenges in data collection and support. The analysis included descriptive statistics and thematic coding. The approach aimed to capture trainee perspectives comprehensively.

Main Results:

Out of 146 trainees, 107 (72.8%) reported performing audit activities. Among those, 52 (48.6%) faced challenges in data collection. The study found that trainee engagement with audit was relatively high. However, data access remained a significant barrier for nearly half the participants. The results suggest that institutional support is a key factor. The findings highlight the need for better data infrastructure. The survey also revealed variability in trainee confidence levels. These results point to the importance of audit facilitation strategies.

Conclusions:

The study suggests that trainee participation in audit is feasible but not without challenges. The authors propose that data availability is a critical barrier. They suggest that improved support could enhance audit engagement. The findings indicate that trainees value audit as a learning tool. The researchers highlight the role of institutional resources in audit success. The study does not claim that audit is the sole method for quality improvement. It does not propose specific policy changes. The authors emphasize the need for further investigation into audit facilitation.

The authors propose that better support structures could increase trainee involvement.