Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On patient judgement.

I G McDonald1, J Daly

  • 1Centre for the Study of Clinical Practice, St Vincent's Hospital, Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Australia. mcdonai@svhm.org.au

Internal Medicine Journal
|August 2, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anaesthesia and non-obstetric surgery in pregnancy.

BJA education·2021
Same author

The impact of COVID-19 on population oral health.

Community dental health·2020
Same author

A unified call to action from Australian nursing and midwifery leaders: ensuring that Black lives matter.

Contemporary nurse·2020
Same author

Acute haemolytic reaction secondary to an ABO minor mismatched platelet transfusion from a group A blood donor.

Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)·2019
Same author

How well does physician selection of microbiologic tests identify Clostridium difficile and other pathogens in paediatric diarrhoea? Insights using multiplex PCR-based detection.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2015
Same author

Dynamic terrain for multiuser real-time environments.

IEEE computer graphics and applications·2014
Same journal

The paradox of peer review: protecting science or policing thought?

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Immune-related pancytopenia in pregnancy.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Crossover effect: causal machine learning reveals opposing mortality responses to mean arterial pressure targets among phenotypically distinct hypertensive patients with septic shock.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Clinicopathological findings, correlations and outcomes in patients with renal disease and living with antiretroviral-treated human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Approach to thyroid disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of specialist hypertension clinics.

Internal medicine journal·2026
See all related articles

Understanding patient judgement is crucial for effective healthcare interventions. Exploring patients' perspectives through qualitative research is essential to address healthcare challenges stemming from varied patient decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare decision-making
  • Medical sociology
  • Patient behavior studies

Background:

  • Clinical judgement is extensively studied, yet patient judgement, crucial for healthcare outcomes, is overlooked.
  • Patient decisions on seeking treatment, adhering to medical advice, and responding to reassurance significantly impact health.
  • Problems like delayed help-seeking and treatment non-compliance stem from a lack of understanding patient judgement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the critical but neglected role of patient judgement in healthcare.
  • To emphasize the need to understand the complex, individualized factors influencing patient decisions.
  • To advocate for research that explores the patient perspective to improve healthcare interventions.

Main Methods:

  • The study critiques the limitations of survey-based research in capturing the complexity of patient decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It argues for the necessity of interpretive field studies, including qualitative patient interviews.
  • Focuses on understanding the 'why' behind patient actions from their viewpoint.

    • Main Results:

    • Patient reactions to health situations are highly variable due to complex interactions of personal, social, and experiential factors.
    • Current medical understanding often perceives unpredictable patient behavior as irrational due to a knowledge gap.
    • Existing research inadequately addresses the patient's perspective on their actions.

    Conclusions:

    • Patient judgement is a unifying factor in significant healthcare problems.
    • Effective interventions require understanding the patient's perspective, which is currently a hiatus in medical knowledge.
    • Qualitative research methods are essential to study the spectrum of patient responses within their unique contexts.